Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Intelligence: North Korea's Sixth Test Was a 140 Kiloton 'Advanced Nuclear' Device
The Diplomat ^ | September 6. 2-17 | Ankit Panda

Posted on 09/06/2017 5:40:49 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Ray76

Who is supplying them?

A country that wants their weapons tested


41 posted on 09/06/2017 6:55:41 AM PDT by butlerweave (it's the children are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

You speak as if Taiwan, Japan, and south Korea were vassal states slavishly following the US line. Sizeable numbers in all those countries want nothing to do with nuclear weapons.


42 posted on 09/06/2017 7:01:19 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The manufacturing part is the easy part. The science and research is the critically hard part.

NK over the last 50 years has perfected complex manufacturing processes using its own internal resources. Kim’s father wrote extensively about this.


43 posted on 09/06/2017 7:12:20 AM PDT by JP1201
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

If you had any personal experience in Pakistan from the 70s through the 80s and 90s, you seriously think “these people can’t possibly develop a nuclear weapon” - but they did.

In the case of North Korea, when EVERYTHING is given second place, including the health and nutrition of the population much less industry advancement in ANY OTHER area, even they can develop a nuke.

Most of the people may be living in poverty, but they have nukes.


44 posted on 09/06/2017 7:19:52 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JP1201

They have the metallurgy and fabrication abilities necessary for rockets? The precision abilities for nukes?


45 posted on 09/06/2017 7:39:34 AM PDT by Ray76 (Republicans are a Democrat party front group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JP1201

> The manufacturing part is the easy part. The science and research is the critically hard part.

The science can be easily transferred in a person’s brain. The manufacturing...


46 posted on 09/06/2017 7:40:30 AM PDT by Ray76 (Republicans are a Democrat party front group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

why not do not have to have a war with us to fight us, fight korea..
I say if it goes nuclear, hit china, pakistan and russia too..


47 posted on 09/06/2017 7:52:26 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“Nuclear Device” implies a hydrogen fusion device.
“Atomic” is a fission device.

140kt is within the range for a smaller hydrogen bomb.


48 posted on 09/06/2017 7:57:15 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour
China or Pakistan is my guess.

Well with butterballs protestation days before the test of "It was a “thermonuclear weapon with super explosive power made by our own efforts and technology”, KCNA cited Kim him as saying, and “all components of the H-bomb were 100 percent domestically made.” pretty well indicates that lil kimmie did it all by himself wink-wink
49 posted on 09/06/2017 8:04:53 AM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

A 140 KT pure fission device is rather advanced. A 140 kt fission-fusion device is rather simple, and once you have the fission part down, adding basic fusion elements is rather easy.

And then there is the Hafnium problem......


50 posted on 09/06/2017 8:18:21 AM PDT by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Lithium 6 or 7?


51 posted on 09/06/2017 8:18:39 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

That has to leave a massive radioactive hole in the ground.

I wonder how big it is.


52 posted on 09/06/2017 8:33:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It was probably Iran conducting nuclear test on NK territory.


53 posted on 09/06/2017 8:36:15 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The Republican Congress can't even pass a budget.

How far down the list is retrofitting everything for EMP? Do we mandate gallium arsenide chips for everything?

54 posted on 09/06/2017 8:37:07 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Someone’s got to start the conversation.

I nominate President Trump.


55 posted on 09/06/2017 8:37:55 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

In the 1950’s. And yeah I think they got design help.
Still it they have it, they have it.


56 posted on 09/06/2017 8:44:33 AM PDT by Kozak (DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
A bombs are actually better for EMP generation, if I am not mistaken. I am so screwed.

Actually, they need to be enhance to produce gamma radiation. That is the HEMP formula. Not unlike our cold war bombs designed to produce enhanced neutron radiation.

57 posted on 09/06/2017 8:46:14 AM PDT by Godzilla ( I just love the smell of COVFEFE in the morning . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

As far as I know there has never been a 140kt fission device, though it’s possible to make one.

It would be big and heavy.


58 posted on 09/06/2017 8:56:33 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Definitely likely.


59 posted on 09/06/2017 8:57:13 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

“how has it avoided detection?”

While uranium is detectable from 10s of miles away...perhaps even low orbit sats, plutonium for weapons is not detectable from across the street.

Men on subs regularly get within 5 feet of the stuff.

Modern weapons are made from mostly plutonium and Norklandia produces their own in their reactor.

Bill Clinton ensured this course.


60 posted on 09/06/2017 9:00:40 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson