Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A summary of the ways that Democrat senators (Durbin, Feinstein, Franken, Sanders) have recently showed their open hostility and intolerance to Christians and Christianity.
1 posted on 09/09/2017 10:18:13 AM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: DeweyCA

Democrats today would crucify Jesus and free Barabas


30 posted on 09/09/2017 11:27:45 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

This is news? Ha! Liberals constantly attack Christians
Most of them believe religious people should be banned from voting.


31 posted on 09/09/2017 11:43:48 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA; All
"When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you," Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) claimed. "And that's of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for for years in this country."

Consider that one reason that uniparty Democratic lawmakers are getting away with asking judicial nominees religion-related questions is because anti-Christian uniparty RINOs are not expressing indignation to unconstitutional questions.

Also, by asking judicial nominees unconstitutional religious questions, uniparty lawmakers probably projecting into nominees the idea that the feds have stolen state power to deal with religion, the feds using those stolen powers to harass Christians.

32 posted on 09/09/2017 11:45:04 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

Would any of these yobs have treated a mussie like that?

Rhetorical question only. We know the answer


33 posted on 09/09/2017 11:47:48 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA
Of the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land until amended in accordance with Article V, Alexander Hamilton asserted:

“Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon them collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption or even knowledge of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives [the executive, judiciary, or legislature]; in a departure from it prior to such an act.” – Alexander Hamilton

If one of the Founders, himself chosen to interpret the Constitution to "the People," through his writings in THE FEDERALIST's 85 Essays, makes such a strong assertion about the nation's Constitution's supremacy, then isn't it reasonable that elected or appointed officials in the government it structures are not allowed to "innovate" upon appropriately-enacted laws flowing from its provisions?

Have the "Progressive Regressives" found some new amendment?

34 posted on 09/09/2017 12:32:34 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

One cannot serve two masters. Serve God or Satan. Democrats certainly do no espouse the teaching of the Bible.


37 posted on 09/09/2017 1:22:52 PM PDT by okie 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

Moslems pass the new Religious Test. Christians Fail.


39 posted on 09/09/2017 2:29:57 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeweyCA

That’s fine! It just shows who democrats are. It kind of looks like they’ve lost their faith in God.


40 posted on 09/09/2017 5:04:22 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson