Trump’s statement is very neutral, but as usual a lot of people will assume the worst.
Yes, gun laws. National preemption, CCW valid in all states just like a driver’s license, and DC, as a federal district, shall respect CCW and laws of all states. Anything else, combined with wobbly response on illegal aliens and amnesty, will mean Trump loses his base and is one term only.
No, we won’t.
You can have a pass on a lot of things bro but, that is a no go.....period...
If Trump thinks the Bill of Rights is going to be revisited, he will see that America itself will be revisited.
If he wants that, well, we shall revisit it.
I think President Trump understands his base pretty well on this issue.
Mr. President, you have only one option:
You can start talking about REPEALING gun laws. Anything else is treason.
Choose wisely.
How about this: Take away all the guns from the criminals FIRST, and then since the criminals don’t have any guns we can talk about the rest.
Trump goes down that road we go another way. Guns are the line in the sand.
Some restraints on fully auto may be appropriate, but Trump knows we would rather kill all the gun grabbers then let them take our guns. We are not Euroweenies. We are not dead Mexicans. And we are not Venezuela.
Sure. In about two weeks. You watch.
Do NOT go there Mr. President.
Bannon can run against him in 2020.
from article (for those who didn’t read it)
“Axios reports that Breitbart News’ executive chairman Steve Bannon observed that Trump’s voting base would react worse to gun control than to an amnesty bill. Bannon said that Trump’s support for gun control would “be the end of everything.””
IMHO, Trump has enforced the immigration laws and will be told what is legal and illegal and will stand by the constitution. He’s a quick learner and I pray to my Father in heaven that Kelly remembers his roots. BTW, read that Ivanka and hubby are doing less in WH.
There must be a new law banning gun-free zones.
The left thanks all of the dead to have the blessed "discussion". I hate these ignorant people.
What would the narrative be if the weapon was a truck or plane? Maybe it would just be against the weapon of "white privilege"?
“We’ll be talking about gun laws as time goes by.”
Sounds to me like he’s putting off the Democrats and denying them the fight they want with him.
Now he simply needs to do nothing.
Alright, President Trump, let's talk. Here's what I say.
IF semi-automatic weapons (or automatic weapons for that matter) had existed in the mid-eighteenth century, then militias would have been so-equipped.
The purpose of the Second Amendment is centered on two ideas: "free State" and "the people."
A third intent is of critical importance: the right "shall not be infringed."
It is our responsibility to defend the free State and to allow no further infringement of out natural rights.