Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Perez Says ‘Electoral College Is Not a Creation of the Constitution’ (It Is.)
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 10/26/17 | Brent Scher

Posted on 10/26/2017 3:06:23 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: Jvette

This Perez is a typical DIM “leader “. What an anti -American oaf...and loser.


61 posted on 10/26/2017 8:19:57 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jvette
There is no national popular vote. The vote is by the states

Please show me where, in the Constitution, there is ANYTHING about a popular vote in the States for the purposes of choosing the President.

62 posted on 10/26/2017 9:21:27 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

There isn’t


63 posted on 10/26/2017 9:36:49 AM PDT by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: apillar; PapaBear3625
...democrats will be in court so fast trying to get a federal judge to throw out their own state compact as unconstitutional and free up the states to appoint electors based on the state by state vote.

That would be fun to watch.

As long as the states got prior Congressional consent via Article I Section 10, a court cannot throw out en masse the valid legislations of each and every state that entered into the compact.

Democrats would either have to claim that one or more states failed to meet the qualifications of the compact in some way (faulty legislation?) which then results in the overall compact falling short of the triggering threshold, and then rebut arguments that faulty state legislation is moot if Congress ultimately consents to the compact.

In any case, this couldn't be done in time for the certification of the Electoral College result, given that 270 EV's worth of states would have to be involved in the court proceedings.

If such a compact were to actually occur, it would be prudent for a non-compact state challenge its constitutionality in the Supreme Court. If it survives this challenge, then that would set the precedent for later claims trying to undo it by saying that it was litigated and held up once already.

-PJ

64 posted on 10/26/2017 12:47:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson