Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump’s Unqualified Judges (the anti-constitutionalist ABA no longer has veto power)
outsidethebeltway.com ^ | 11/12/17 | Doug Mataconis

Posted on 11/12/2017 8:13:46 AM PST by cotton1706

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: cotton1706

So his disqualification is not that he graduated from a prestigious law school and has 10 years experience in the Justice Department, it’s because he tweeted mean things about Hillary and said something dumb about rebelling?


21 posted on 11/12/2017 9:39:27 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Having “tried” or “not tried” a case is completely a false criterion. There’s way more to the practice of law than “first-chairing” at trial. In fact I would argue that while trial lawyers may be the best actors and publicity hounds, they are seldom the sharpest knife in the drawer, so to speak. Also, it has been my experience that trial lawyers seldom care about the “right outcome” in terms of justice. They mostly want to win. By the way, the ABA is useless.


22 posted on 11/12/2017 9:47:36 AM PST by TrueFact (The Republicans keep putting the stopper back in the swamp drain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934

“Did justice Kagen ever “ hear a case” as a judge? Did the ABA say she was unqualified??????”

Jewish & Hispanic females are “automatically deemed” qualified by the ABA. We probably are stuck with Kagan (57), but Ruth Buzzy(84) is way past her sell by date, and I understand the Wise Latrina (63) has cancer, so perhaps we Trump will get to appoint their replacements along with Kennedy (81) and Breyer (79). So hopefully we will get at least three and possibly four appointments. Kennedy has reportedly indicated he’s going to retire after this term. Trump needs another Gorsuch in his slot for starters.


23 posted on 11/12/2017 9:52:56 AM PST by vette6387 (LOCK HER UP! COMEY TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

My only qualification for judges is conservative and under 50. Under 40 is even better.


24 posted on 11/12/2017 10:02:11 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The ABA is a liberal front. It is not qualified to judge. Its last issue made it clear that race and gender are the most important qualifications. Not competence.


25 posted on 11/12/2017 10:32:37 AM PST by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Know the story of the ice pick and guy looking through the keyhole? I do. Not pretty.


26 posted on 11/12/2017 10:39:53 AM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The author of this article had his law license suspended:

From the VA Lawyers Weekly, 4-3-14:

Another Virginia lawyer accepted a nine-month suspension last month after he acknowledged failing to help a client as promised and failing to respond to a bar complaint.
Douglas E. Mataconis agreed to represent a Prince William County couple who hoped to block construction on a nearby residential development, according to an agreed statement of facts.
Despite exchanging information on how to proceed for more than a year, Mataconis never completed a promised letter of protest to the county board, nor did he provide any substantive assistance with the couple’s effort, according to the statement.
Moreover, Mataconis acknowledged he never responded when the VSB sent notice of the clients’ bar complaint.
After receiving the stipulation of evidence and hearing from both the bar and Mataconis, the Disciplinary Board panel proposed the nine-month suspension, according to assistant bar counsel Prescott L. Prince. Mataconis agreed to the suspension.
Mataconis is a prolific contributor on the blog “Outside the Beltway,” described as an online journal of politics and foreign affairs analysis.


27 posted on 11/12/2017 11:01:30 AM PST by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Jack Aubrey

The has a history of being lunatic LIBS intent on undermining the Rule of Law under the Constitution.


28 posted on 11/12/2017 11:10:42 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Hypocritically, and with nothing but political discourse, the ABA considered Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee, “well qualified” for the US Supreme Court even though she never served as a judge in any capacity.

The ABA stated before Congress the following about Kagan:

"The Standing Committee unanimously concluded that General Kagan merits our highest rating and is “Well Qualified” for appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States."

So, the ABA considers an Obama appointee qualified for the highest court without ever having been a judge, but the ABA doesn't consider a Trump appointee qualified for a lower court who has never been a judge.

That is nothing but extreme left-wing politics from the ABA.

Lawyers should be embarrassed that their labor union plays such politics.

29 posted on 11/12/2017 11:13:00 AM PST by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrueFact
Having “tried” or “not tried” a case is completely a false criterion.

I respectfully disagree. A district judge presides over trials and every other aspect of litigation. A lawyer who has little courtroom experience is unlikely to be familiar with the the nuts and bolts of trial and motion practice, the rules of evidence, and the procedural issues that get district judges reversed on appeal.

I do agree with you regarding the ABA. I let my membership lapse long ago when it got too political.

30 posted on 11/12/2017 11:44:18 AM PST by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
For the fourth time since January, one of President Trump’s nominees for a Federal Judgeship has received given the extremely rare “not qualified” rating from to the American Bar Association
31 posted on 11/12/2017 12:44:33 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Excellent.


32 posted on 11/12/2017 3:11:23 PM PST by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson