Problematic Women: Meghan Markle a Bad Feminist for Marrying, Giving Up Career

The Daily Signal ^ | November 30, 2017 | Kelsey Harkness

[nickcarraway]

His parents were divorced serial adulterers. And Harry is a Nazi sympathizer.

[Catmom]

Maybe. Maybe not.

[Catmom]

I doubt there was a marriageable 20-something year old gal left in Britain who wanted to have anything to do with him.

[Secret Agent Man]

Its just a smokescreen piece.

All women love hypergamy. Its what they do.

[a fool in paradise]

A man is as useless to a woman/feminist as a bicycle is to a fish.

So says the Girls’ Club.

[mrs. a]

“...she is going to be quite literally entirely dependent on her husband and his family.”

And we all saw how Princess Diana was forced to go on the dole and live in a council flat after Charles threw her over.

[b4me]

all she is is an opportunist.

[moovova]

Are you sure, dude? There are worse ways to go...

[MinuteGal]

Grotesque is obviously in fashion these days.

Leni

[moovova]

LOL...beauty is in the eye of the buttholder.

[jjotto]

Stupid author of this piece!

This is MM’s sensational career move. A few years rubbing elbows with inbred Euros and she’ll be more in demand for a reality show, product lines and endorsements than the Kardashians. Just the upcoming book about her royal divorce will net her $10 million easy.

[MinuteGal]

LOL back atcha !

Leni

[Vendome]

She is so hot but, has that Kuh-Ray-Zee Bitchitis disability

She was exhausting....

[BookmanTheJanitor]

I love how feminism went from ‘women having choices’ to ‘choose as we say’.

[the_individual2014]

I would tap something like that.

[SamAdams76]

I love how feminism went from ‘women having choices’ to ‘choose as we say’.

That is because misery loves company. It enrages feminists to see other women obtain happiness through marriage and child-bearing because those are the things that they gave up to be feminists.