Posted on 12/06/2017 5:57:59 PM PST by Kaslin
I stand corrected.
I knew Anita Hill’s allegations were total bull$hit when she made ‘em, and those hearings (which I watched at the time) were a total farce: best described as a high-tech lynching of a Conservative Black man. She admitted she was a Democrat (Strike #1) and she followed Thomas from job to job, not exactly the mark of an abused underling and more that of a stalker (Strike #2), and she hated that Thomas married a White woman (Strike #3, you’re out).
Thomas has proven himself to be in the top 3 greatest SCOTUS jurists in the past 100 years along with Scalia and Rehnquist.
>They definitely have a game plan and they are going after big game.
They don’t have a game plan. This is a moral panic like the Salim witch trials. They’re purging people left in right trying because of Trump’s win. They can’t explain their loss so they’re applying leftist morality that’s typically only applied on their opponents to themselves in attempt to purify themselves.
This is why it’s very, very important for us not to apply their morality to our side. Let them purge their own, but demand real proof, due process, and protect our own people from their witch hunters. When they realize we’re not going to eat our own, they’ll stick to hunting witches in their own ranks.
Then there are two offended parties, er, witnesses. They definitely should resign. No doubt about it!
Good news - they’re already overstepping in their attempts to suddenly seem virtuous....”It’s a miracle! I feel virtuous today! Now, on to slime and destroy actual virtuous folks....”
That is a call to all the hystericals out there, for one of them to “remember” something that Clarence “did” 30 years ago. It’s how they do things.
Past 100 years? I’d rank ‘em Scalia, Pierce Butler and Thomas.
And I have no reason not to believe you.
Isn't that what I'm supposed to say?
‘Sometimes I wonder if this is women’s revenge.’
‘sometimes’ you wonder this...?
Damn, do these idiots want a for real shooting war?
Leave Justice Thomas ALONE!
There’s a word Australians use to describe spectacular, breath-taking stupidity: F**ktardery.
The F**tardery of Rats knows no bounds.
If Anita Hill is dead, she can’t give false testimony
‘Leftists do it because they are atheists’
they are not atheists;they practice their own religion as avidly as the most ardent evangelist...
if they were truly agnostic regarding cultural norms, they’d be far more pleasant with which to deal...
“Wouldn’t be a hoot to Justice Thomas.”
Sorry - should have been more clear. My thought was along the lines of Thomas *volunteering* to retire - and naming his “mini-me” replacement (with POTUS on board of course).
Hang 'em! That's what you're supposed to say. Belief has nothing to do with it. The seriousness of the charge is sufficient without belief. Who needs to believe it! Itjust has to be "serious." LOL!
“Thomas has proven himself to be in the top 3 greatest SCOTUS jurists in the past 100 years along with Scalia and Rehnquist.”
Yes. In retrospect, nominating Justice Thomas was the best thing GHWB did as POTUS.
No, it’s time for Anita Hill to perform seppuku. How else can she expunge herself of the shame of being such an obvious liar?
The Clinton Philosophy is "If witness X is dead, he or she can't give true testimony. Arrange their accidental/suicide/natura-cause death. Just remember we need 'plausible deniability' when it happens."
Jay Kaganoff is a freelance writer based in Brooklyn. He has written for National Review Online and Commentary Magazine, among others.
Some astute readers have been researching this guy for the last day and a half, and nobody can find any evidence that he ever wrote for NRO or Commentary at all. The website moderators are furiously deleting posts that point this out.
The Washington Post may have posted a fake op-ed piece from a fake author.
I give Rehnquist a slot on the top three if only because he deserves canonization for staying on the bench throughout the horrid Clinton regime despite being in considerable physical pain, not wanting to give him the opportunity to name another abomination to the bench (just think, he might’ve put Jerry Brown as Chief Justice).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.