FBI chief's claim on surveillance abuse doesn't fit the evidence

The Hill ^ | 12/15/17 01:50 PM EST | Sharyl Attkisson

[Lady Heron]

Ok, whole other take(which may be garbage but interesting)....

After reading Mega Anon's take on what was going on in the FBI with Strozk I think the word you need to concentrate on is evidence. She is claiming that it was Strozk job to manufacture documents(not just FBI). Scroll down to the say Dec. 13 and onward.Today's and yesterday's postings really answer some questions about what is going and why what Wray has seen so far could support that claim, if true. It also puts Comey in a different light and sheds light on his tweets about justice and honor.

.https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/795d6a/megaanon_postings_compiled_may_2017_present/

To really get a feel for her belief's on Mueller(which are not kind) you need to go back farther.

[Uncle Miltie]

True.