If Democrats Take the House, They'll Impeach Trump

American Thinker.com ^ | January 18, 2018 | Steve Feinstein

[Kaslin]

Anyone that stays home or votes for some third party candidate, which is a vote against the president, is guilty if the rats take over the House and impeach President Trump

[BenLurkin]

Impeach him for what?

[Puppage]

In spite of Clinton's oratorical skill, favorable media coverage, and appealing looks and smooth demeanor

El Puke-O

[Da Coyote]

Let them do it.
We’ll deal with that.
Dems will NOT like the deal.

[montag813]

HATE and the promise of impeachment is what will motivate leftists to send PACs tens of millions to elect Democrats.

[MeganC]

If the GOP passes some sort of amnesty for illegals and their ‘DACA’ illegals then the GOP deserves to lose the election.

[nwrep]

They will have to.

[DoughtyOne]

Russian collusion...

Sh_thole nations comment...

Didn’t happen
Didn’t say it

Not high crimes? Well the Leftists think they ought to be.

[jazminerose]

Good. It’s the ultimate Look Squirrel. Let them wrap themselves around that axel and run on impeachment which nobody will want.

The dems can put all of their resources into chasing ghosts. There simply are no grounds for impeachment. And certainly none for removal.

Meanwhile, actual Americans are getting bonuses, bigger paychecks, better jobs, and watching their 401(K)s grow like crabgrass on a vacant lot.

One more time, dems are utterly out of touch and completely tone deaf.

Let’s be thankful for their stupidity.

[Sopater]

Anyone that stays home or votes for some third party candidate, which is a vote against the president, is guilty if the rats take over the House and impeach President Trump.

Wrong.

[Leep]

Putting katsup on his steak?

[TalBlack]

If Dems want the gloves to come off...then the gloves will come off. I’m good with that.

[Telepathic Intruder]

Even if they do, impeachment does not mean removal from office. It’s just a formal statement of charges. It would be interesting to see what those charges could possibly be, however. Something like “we don’t like him”, or “he made us sad”, probably.

[central_va]

If

[ripley]

“Impeach him for what?”

Pick a card, any card.

One can always depend on extra-Constitutional scu&bags to be extra-Constitutional scu&bags, and they’ll succeed because they have the backing of generations of indoctrinated scu&bags.

IMHO

[jz638]

I almost want to see it happen because like every thing else in the era of Trump, the attacks on him haven’t proven effective and only revealed that his attackers are mostly a collection of clowns.

[LIConFem]

Ay, 'tis a dangerous game they're playin' indeed.

III

[buckalfa]

"Meanwhile, actual Americans are getting bonuses, bigger paychecks, better jobs, and watching their 401(K)s grow like crabgrass on a vacant lot."

Do not forget the gimmedat 47%. They vote and will vote en mass if their freebees are threatened by the tax cuts.

[Zionist Conspirator]

The Demoncraps might as well go on ahead and make their party the only legal one in the country. They certainly have that mentality.

[Vaquero]

I’ll march to Washington then. And if he’s then convicted, it’s war.