“The Constitution prohibits government actions hostile to a religion,” she said.
Wow. A whole lot of Christians are going to be thrilled to hear that!
Who do these people think they are?
answer -— god
The travel ban on countries where terrorists come from did not establish a religion. What insanity.
Trump can’t clean up the judiciary fast enough.
Curious that they never mention a no travel ban from Indonesia, with the world's largest Muslim population. What about India and others with huge Muslim populations?
They have a problem with not allowing entry of North Koreans? The liberal/socialist democrats have shown they actually do have a mental disorder. There is no cure for the lack of commonsense of the Dims. Even grade school children learn some playground kids are just bad news.
Ever think federal judges should face re-appointment if their decisions are overruled by higher authority say 3 times in one year?
I’m getting so damn tired of these dictators in black robes that are accountable to noone once in office. I know, the Congress can impeach these political judges, but that is essentially noone since Congress doesn’t have the backbone to do anything and the Dems in Congress would just obstruct any attempt to bring these dictators in line with the Constitution.
This is what happens when you do not challenge their authority. Trump should have ignored their first attempt and forced them to appeal.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Amendment I doesn’t apply to the President, only to Congress.
Hasn’t the Supremes already ruled on this?
Where the hell in the Constitution does it say that Americans cannot prevent being overrun by terrorists? I must have missed that. BTW: Has Virginia legalized marijuana or are these activist, liberal “judges” just brainless morons?
[In a 9-4 vote, the Richmond-based court upheld a Maryland district judge’s preliminary injunction against the ban taking full effect and ruled that the travel restrictions violate the Constitution’s Establishment Clause, which bars the government establishment of a religion.]
Talk about reaching. What an embarrassment.
Which nations Constitution are they referring to,certainly not the USA.
These scumbag judges apparently believe that they are above the law and can override our country’s laws, the Supreme Court and the President of the United States of America.
These stinkin’ judges belong in jail. All of them!
Why is there no penalty when these baboso judges are obvious stoopids?
This too will be overturned making this jurist to look the fool.
Course said baboso is a fool
<>The Maryland ruling was made by U.S. District Judge Theodore D. Chuang. Like Watson, he determined that Trump's executive order was "the realization of the long-envisioned Muslim ban" and also pointed to comments made by Trump throughout his campaign.
In the Hawaii ruling, U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson issued a nationwide halt to the ban that would have barred new visas and prevented the admission of new refugees. It was a stinging rebuke of Trump's second attempt to institute the controversial order just hours before it was to take effect.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/03/16/
trump-travel-ban-targeting-muslim-countries/99244568/
So, suddenly the ACLU cares about freedom of religion. So that means a prayer before a football came or public cross is now OK? Right? Right?
Richmond has always been a bastion of liberal/leftist shitheads. These clowns just proved it again.
The Supreme Court will destroy their fallacious argument in about three sentences about Executive/Presidential powers on immigration, national security/defense, and common sense.
What happened to the SCOTUS ruling unequivocally affirming Trump’s EO?