Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2018 6:58:42 AM PST by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: davikkm

Vachel Lindsay
@_VachelLindsay_

1. As the nation grieves and focussed on the tragedy in Broward Country, Susan Rice responds to the Feb 8 letter from Senators Graham & Grassley concerning her CYA email about the secret 5 Jan 2017 meeting in the Oval Office. https://twitter.com/eschor/...

2. First thing to note : it is NOT a reply & highly EVASIVE. It doesn’t reply to most of the 12 questions raised in the Feb 8 letter. Here’s the letter sent by Grassley & Graham: https://mobile.twitter.com/...

3. Some interesting observations :

#1 : Rice now seems to be restricting the participants to Obama, herself, Comey & Gates. Her CYA email of 5 Jan, 2017 specifically included Biden in the meeting.

4. #2: she claims that they never discussed the Steele dossier, quote:

‘In the conversation Ambassador Rice documented, there was no discussion of Christopher Steele or the Steele dossier, contrary to the suggestion in your letter.’

5. #3 : Rice claims that there were ‘concerning communications between members of the Trump team and Russian
officials, before and after the election’ and that ‘concerns about national security’ /...

6. /.. particularly ‘highly classified information about
Russia’ with ‘certain members of the Trump transition team, particularly Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.’

Communications and highly classified information which, of course, no one has ever seen.

7. Note that despite the apparent sensitivity of the meeting, Rice didn’t record the meeting until 20 Jan, in an email she sent to herself. Because ‘I was so busy’.

An email she now claims has the wrong timestamp on it.Because she says she’d left the WH.

I’m not kidding.

8. Then Rice denies knowing anything about the FBI investigation, or FISA warrant until 2017.

Seems odd that Comey and Gates, who had signed the FISA applications, never even mentioned them in a conversation with Rice & Obama about ‘Trump-Russia’ & Gen Flynn.

Very odd indeed.

9. So there you have it. What’s been framed as a ‘reply’ to Sens Grassley & Graham is just a set of talking points for the baying seals of Obama/Clinton’s slave media.

Rice isn’t just continuing to cover her ass. She’s also desperately trying to COA. Cover O’s ass.

10. We now have a meeting with no Joe Biden, where Obama, Comey, Gates and Rice talk about highly classified information, so serious it justified them not sharing it with the new administration.

11. But in this meeting about Trump-Russia, the Steele dossier, FISA spying & FBI investigation were never discussed.

‘We didn’t do nuffin’, promise.’

You can’t make this BS up. Actually that’s wrong.

12. Susan Rice IS making it up and digging the deep hole she finds herself, even deeper.

Why? Because Grassley & Graham already have all the answers to their questions. EVERYTHING.

Rice, being a pathological liar and arrogant as hell, is calling their bluff.

BAD MOVE.

13. The MSM will now spin this non-reply as fast as their lying little minds can manage.

It will change nothing in the real world. Rice has chosen to go down with the others, who no doubt may take her lead and try to spin the same tale.

All to protect Barack.

14. In the real world, all the evidence has been gathered. Now it’s just a question of seeing how many rats fess up with the truth, and how many choose to lie to protect Obama & Clinton.

Susan Rice chose poorly.

The end.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/967239465868574720.html


37 posted on 02/24/2018 8:24:54 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

Thomas Wictor
@ThomasWictor

(1) @drawandstrike @YeeunMin1 THERE WE GO.

Susan Rice’s lawyers respond to Grassley and Graham.

Click on ink to read entire thread

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/967275277045809152.html


40 posted on 02/24/2018 9:35:21 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm

“Lawyer for Susan Rice Says Last-Minute Email Was to Create ‘Permanent Record’...”

“Create” being the operative word here.


43 posted on 02/24/2018 11:54:17 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Have an A-1 day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: davikkm
Lawyer for Susan Rice Says Last-Minute Email Was to Create ‘Permanent Record’ of Obama-Comey

Oh, ok, now I understand. Sorry about my initial doubt that she created the ex post facto emails in order to create False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence or tainted evidence to sway the verdict in a court case.
45 posted on 02/24/2018 12:48:53 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson