Skip to comments.
Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale: Democrats
Reuters - Yahoo News ^
| 08-March-2018
| Warren Strobel
Posted on 03/09/2018 7:36:07 AM PST by ptsal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
**more** The Uranium One sale was unanimously approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which comprises representatives of nine U.S. government agencies. When the issue was voted on, the State Department was represented not by Clinton, but by a lower-level official.
Five committees in the U.S. House and Senate previously looked into the issue and found no evidence that Clinton was behind CFIUS' approval of the deal, according to congressional records.
1
posted on
03/09/2018 7:36:07 AM PST
by
ptsal
To: ptsal
Audit the Clintoon “Foundations”.
2
posted on
03/09/2018 7:37:14 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: ptsal
Nothing like having the Democrat MINORITY bull ahead with their release of information.
Sounds like a violation of the committee’s rules and ethics. /s
3
posted on
03/09/2018 7:37:19 AM PST
by
ptsal
( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
To: ptsal
More spin.
But they want Trump investigated forever for non-existent Russian collusion.
Got it.
4
posted on
03/09/2018 7:38:12 AM PST
by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
To: ptsal
Well DUH! What good is BleachBit if you can't destroy evidence permanently. Geez ...
5
posted on
03/09/2018 7:40:03 AM PST
by
Be Free
(I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
To: ptsal
Informant had plenty of evidence of Russian interference, yet the deal was still approved. And the Clintoons are too smart in the ways of corruption to leave smoking guns of a quid pro quo lying around. So this is meaningless.
6
posted on
03/09/2018 7:40:23 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: Paladin2
No amount of allegations, evidence or facts are serious enough for certain select Democrats to be thought badly of by other Democrats.
7
posted on
03/09/2018 7:40:58 AM PST
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: ptsal
8
posted on
03/09/2018 7:48:27 AM PST
by
Bratch
("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
To: ptsal
ANYTHING the Clinton mob gets involved with provides money or power for them. Grifters supreme.
9
posted on
03/09/2018 7:51:26 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: ptsal
Yup, and the $145 million in donations to the Clintoons Foundation from beneficiaries of the Uranium One sale was purely coincidental!!!
Such accomplished LIARS.
To: ptsal
The fact that said informant is still breathing implies that he either knows nothing, or his silence has been bought off by the “Clinton Foundation”.
11
posted on
03/09/2018 7:52:55 AM PST
by
ssaftler
(Just another sunny day in the land of the fruits, nuts, flakes and illegals.)
To: ptsal
"Mr. Campbell (closed his eyes and ears to make sure he) identified no evidence that Secretary Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, or anyone from the Obama Administration took any actions as a result of Russian requests or influence," the summary says. .....
12
posted on
03/09/2018 7:56:24 AM PST
by
trebb
(I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...mostly ;-})
To: ptsal
It only took ONE vote to scuttle the deal.
13
posted on
03/09/2018 8:01:18 AM PST
by
Mouton
(The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
To: EagleUSA
“Mr. Campbell identified no evidence that Secretary Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, or anyone from the Obama Administration took any actions as a result of Russian requests or influence,”
Nah, they just did it out of the kindness of their hearts.
14
posted on
03/09/2018 8:04:21 AM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: ptsal
“You have no proof that 2+2=4” - Democrats
15
posted on
03/09/2018 8:18:35 AM PST
by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: ptsal
I always have to ask “In what form might such evidence exist?” How would one find such evidence?
Would there be a receipt from the Clinton Foundation? How about a “thank you” note from Hill & Bill “Thanks so much for your contribution, enjoy your isotopes?” “Helluva speech there, Bill, tell Hillary we really appreciate the yellowcake?” “You’re really an alpha male there, Bill, thanks for the rays!”
To: ptsal
That statement is preposterous. Any one vote from the CFIUS team can stop it, and to think a decision this momentus was left up to a state dept flunkie defies rational thought. The FBI had informants as well and Mueller buried the criminality for 5 years to help Hillary.
The document is a sham.
Why did McCabe of the FBI stop the investigation into the Clinton Fund? All corrupt
17
posted on
03/09/2018 8:20:51 AM PST
by
Titus-Maximus
(It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
To: ptsal
So, she must be innocent then, huh?
18
posted on
03/09/2018 8:23:15 AM PST
by
Slyfox
(Not my circus, not my monkeys)
To: Slyfox
“...had no evidence...” doesn’t negate that it happened and that she’s guilty as he**. Lock her up prior to stretching her neck (after a fair trial and guilty verdict, of course).
19
posted on
03/09/2018 8:46:28 AM PST
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: ptsal
20
posted on
03/09/2018 8:47:42 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson