Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cost for California bullet train system rises to $77.3 billion
Los Angeles Times ^ | March 9, 2018 | RALPH VARTABEDIAN

Posted on 03/10/2018 6:33:11 AM PST by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: blackdog

Politicians destroyed central valley real estate prices by cutting off their water. The politicians and their cronies were then able to purchase real estate in the proposed rail areas at a very low price.


21 posted on 03/10/2018 6:52:49 AM PST by caltaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Really. Think about it. Set up high speed turnoffs and a separate terminal just for an autonomously piloted shuttle Airbus. Sort of like 500mph touch-n-go’s from Seattle to San Diego. Allocated airway and STAR & SID to provide automated landings and takeoff.


22 posted on 03/10/2018 6:54:39 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Fiasco.

23 posted on 03/10/2018 6:56:42 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Kill: Hollywood,google,CNN,TWITTER,FACEBOOK,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

***The price of the California bullet train project jumped sharply Friday when the state rail authority announced that the cost of connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco would be $77.3 billion and could rise as high as $98.1 billion — an uptick of at least $13 billion from estimates two years ago. ***

Somehow Boss Tweed’s Courthouse comes to mind.


24 posted on 03/10/2018 6:57:46 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Re-open the insane asylums, stop drugging the kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

2033
78 Billion likely even more
Madness


25 posted on 03/10/2018 6:58:29 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag
I live in South Carolina ... I am NOT going to California (ever!) Tell me again why MY tax dollars should help California

I live in Florida, I don't care how much California is paying for the boondoggle train.

California is paying for the vast majority of the cost, not US taxpayers.

26 posted on 03/10/2018 6:59:35 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

And every bit of that violates the terms outlined in the original initiative. I bet the hot shot who spent his wealth to get it passed regrets it now


27 posted on 03/10/2018 6:59:40 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Relax. That’s only $824 million...

... per mile.

The entire interstate system cost $128.9 billion


28 posted on 03/10/2018 6:59:57 AM PST by jimjohn (2nd American Civil War: ongoing since January 20, 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette

Well read this
Guess who the got the METHEXPRESS conract?

Mar 20, 2015 - Dianne Feinstein’s husband wins near-billion dollar California ‘high speed rail’ contract. By Thomas Lifson ... husband of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, was awarded a nearly billion-dollar contract for the construction of the first phase of the so-called high-speed rail line to link San Francisco and Los Angeles.

SCRAP THIS BOONDOGGLE. PUT IN A FREEWAY INSTEAD!


29 posted on 03/10/2018 7:00:40 AM PST by hapnHal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If they kept the route from la to San Francisco like planned, it wouldn’t be a problem. But they decided to go into rural areas of the state too. Dumb!!!


30 posted on 03/10/2018 7:02:40 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Technology has moved beyond fixed transportation infrastructure as surely as the Germans moved beyond the Maginot Line.

Watch this FIVE YEAR OLD video of acrobatic drones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2itwFJCgFQ

If you watched Musk’s boosters returning to Canaveral, you’ve seen one possibility. Musk has said this technology will be used for mass transit very soon.


31 posted on 03/10/2018 7:03:47 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

Lol. California actually helps South Carolina survive. You are funny though.


32 posted on 03/10/2018 7:03:49 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Dianne’s husband’s companies have already made billions of dollars off of transportation projects. It is the Democratic way!


33 posted on 03/10/2018 7:05:43 AM PST by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

$98,000,000,000... and likely to go higher... All to shave about 20-30 in off of the overall trip from LA to SF... and seriously, how many people commute between those two cities on a regular basis?


34 posted on 03/10/2018 7:07:48 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Lol. California actually helps South Carolina survive. You are funny though.

And you're hilarious. I guarantee you that virtually every South Carolina citizen would be more than happy to say "keep whatever it is that you think is "help" to yourself, we're just fine without it, bless your heart."

35 posted on 03/10/2018 7:10:03 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wouldn’t flying be better between big cities and use trains etc for moving people from airports to smaller towns, the downtown or the burbs?

It just seems to make more sense than to waste all this money and take over all this land. Nevermind the earthquake issue. But what the hell do I know.


36 posted on 03/10/2018 7:11:36 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

What’s Brown’s take?


37 posted on 03/10/2018 7:15:28 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Maybe Trump can figure out a way to kill it.


38 posted on 03/10/2018 7:16:07 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If they mention a real number the minimum expected budget should be calculated as at least 2.5 times that number. The original estimate was roughly in the 30 billion dollar range and here we are at 77.5. Now that they’re mentioning 77.5 we should be thinking about 180 to 190 billion. If it can go as high as 98.5 then it is a solid 250 and no one should have any doubt that the number will ultimately exceed 300 billion or 10 times the original estimate
. This is standard operating procedure.


39 posted on 03/10/2018 7:17:56 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It’ll be way over $200B before it’s over.


40 posted on 03/10/2018 7:18:17 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson