Posted on 03/17/2018 5:16:46 AM PDT by Kaslin
It used to be gov’t workers were paid well under the industry averages, but they had a good retirement to look forward to. Now they are paid more than industry, work less, and have a much much much better retirement plan.
Depending on the quality of information cooperating witnesses provide and to whom their testimony leads, I, for one, am fine with the lower level conspiritors getting little to no time in prison, as long as Lynch, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and their boss(es) are punished.
It seems to me McCabe had his chance to save his own arse and declined.
At the time he was allowed to be a double-dipper. He went from the Navy to a job working as a civilian at the Pentagon, which he did for another 20, getting another pension.
It's my understanding you can't do that anymore.
I think you mean 26 hours.
Thank you. Heck, fed employees don’t need to be anywhere near DC to share the goldbrick mindset.
The NICS/FBI center springs to mind. Also one IRS office (the infamous Cincinnati office that was blamed for Lois Lerner’s misdeeds) where they had a ‘walk at lunch’ health incentive. Well, they walked at lunch. And then they realized they didn’t need to walk so they sat and talked and ate. Some of them smoked while sitting (so much for health). They also realized that nobody would miss them if ‘lunch’ ran to 2, then 3 hrs so they stayed outside in good weather.
But God help you if you stood in front of the doors at 3:30 pm sharp when they all rushed out as if someone phoned in a bomb threat.
- “50th birthday, when he would have become eligible for full retirement benefits.”
- I understand the military 20 year retirement, because getting the young to commit to war, separation, isolation, and 24/7 duty is unique.
- Maybe being FBI is also dangerous, but do regular GS employees also have a 20 year plan? Happens for many groups....firemen, policemen, military.
Those who are promoted towards the top, get to stay in 30 years, and receive about 55% of their base pay (base pay doesn’t include any of the benefits you have been receiving; housing, specialty pay, etc).
Those leaving at 20 to 29 years get proportionately less. Retirement pay at 20 years in not much, 20% of base pay, I think.
Now, the difference with other gov employees, some who may or may not be getting retirement pay immediately after they retire, is our pay is given immediately after retirement is because the military keeps you on retainer until age 55. This means in time of a big war, they can call you up and you cannot say no.
It’s worse than that.
I personally know government workers who “retired” from one position, received full pension benefits, then returned to work in another government job which also ended with additional retirement benefits.
Common for most Civil Service jobs, too.
I’ve been retired too long. There are four plans now. The first, for those who enlisted before 1981 is the best. They get progressively less generous. One example of the changes, can get 40% base pay after 20 years.
Go to this site to see the latest. https://www.military.com/benefits/military-pay/computing-retired-military-pay.html
Holy Crap.
I can’t believe Sessions had the stones to do it.
Now maybe some of these swamp pricks will be on notice.
Good news is that he’ll qualify for a prison medical care plan.
How great it must have been for Jeff Sessions to shed his cowardice cape for ONE DAY and do the right thing!!!
Yep, he’s the bad guy not the crooked FBI scum called McCabe.
“I personally know government workers who “retired” from one position, received full pension benefits, then returned to work in another government job which also ended with additional retirement benefits.”
It’s called ‘double dipping’ and is as old as the hills here in MA.
Not correct.
20 years = 50% base pay
30 years = 75% base pay.
They are changing it now though to include a 401K like plan so that if you leave before 20 years you have something for it.
Military retirees should be getting the 1.8 million dollar pensions, NOT swamp creatures.
“I never said FULL benefits at age 50. It’s early retirement at age 50.
Common for most Civil Service jobs, too.”
Whatever, it’s friggin’ BS.
I get nothing until age 62. And then it’s peanuts.
Why should “Public Servants” get more? And earlier?
That means I dig ditches, while those who are supposed to be “serving” me are off to the Bahamas.
On MY dime.
UNACCEPTABLE.
My aging eyes misread part of the report, that McCabe “licked candy” …
(Then again, perhaps someone should give this poor baby a lollipop to help console him while he’s crying over this ;-)
Again, 100% correct and exactly the problem. I wouldn’t mind (and actually support the idea) paying them above the industry average if they actually performed better than their industrial counterparts. But they don’t. Because unlike their counterparts they aren’t held accountable when they screw up, or perform in a substandard way. So there’s no motivation to perform at the level their salary should demand. Should demand for anyone with a conscience. Which evidently they don’t have. (Well most in the higher levels anyway).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.