Skip to comments.
Feds Spend $347,176 Studying If Sex Is Good With Contraception (WI)
The Washington Free Beacon ^
| June 6, 2018
| Elizabeth Harrington
Posted on 06/07/2018 9:33:09 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
"The study, which began last fall, has received $347,176 from taxpayers so far. Research will continue through March 2021."
On, Wisconsin? Our University is out of control. Why do Lesbians need birth control? I'm confused...
*Rolleyes*
To: Diana in Wisconsin
2
posted on
06/07/2018 9:36:19 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
3
posted on
06/07/2018 9:36:28 AM PDT
by
GOP Poet
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Which results in lower STDs including genital warts?
4
posted on
06/07/2018 9:36:58 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“...benefits of not having children”
That is what the study was really about. Here is the big red, bias flag.
5
posted on
06/07/2018 9:37:55 AM PDT
by
VaeVictis
(~Woe to the Conquered~)
To: a fool in paradise
Yeah. Disability is health.
War is Peace.
Slavery is Freedom.
Ignorance is Strength.
Tagline courtesy of George Orwell.
6
posted on
06/07/2018 9:38:06 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Power is tearing human minds apart and putting them back together in new shapes of your own choosing)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Simply choose abstinence.
7
posted on
06/07/2018 9:38:14 AM PDT
by
fulltlt
To: Diana in Wisconsin
The goal of the study is to match women with the method "they will find the most sexually acceptable." Okay, let's see if it fits...
Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have Power To...
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, ...
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, ...
To provide and maintain a Navy...
To match women with the method they will find the most sexually acceptable.
Okay, sounds good. Fits right in there /s
8
posted on
06/07/2018 9:39:13 AM PDT
by
C210N
(Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Since lesbians DON’T NEED contraception, I’m thinking this has more to do with preventing transmission of STDs.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Is Congress even using contraception when the public is involved?
Learn something new every day...
10
posted on
06/07/2018 9:41:41 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
How many times have we heard that government should “stay out of our bedroom?” Apparently, there is an exception when some university morons can squeeze almost $350,000 in grant money out of the U.S. taxpayers. They obviously don’t have a real job like those do who earned that money.
To: DoughtyOne
12
posted on
06/07/2018 9:43:58 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
We really need a study of this subject? Pills and other forms of birth control have been around for decades. I’m surprised if there haven’t already been similar studies done.
Maybe couples can talk it over, and decide which methods work best for them, as a couple, considering various aspects of their lives together?
Or is that not good because then there’s no funding needed for a study?
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Inconceivable!
14
posted on
06/07/2018 9:45:57 AM PDT
by
golux
To: Diana in Wisconsin
15
posted on
06/07/2018 9:45:58 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“Feds Spend $347,176 Studying If Sex Is Good With Contraception (WI)”
Do they need a control group...a friend asks.
16
posted on
06/07/2018 9:47:27 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Contraception is freedom. More useful idiot women afraid to say no.
17
posted on
06/07/2018 9:47:42 AM PDT
by
amihow
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“...the social, economic, and health benefits” of not having children.
What? Is this taxpayer funded?
18
posted on
06/07/2018 9:50:51 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
We need a lot more 10th Amendment and a lot less of this....
19
posted on
06/07/2018 9:52:48 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: VaeVictis
“...benefits of not having children
I heard that refrain often from my mother.
20
posted on
06/07/2018 9:55:04 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson