Mueller has nothing.
His charges are totally fraudulent.
Now Mueller is saying that the defendants are not allowed to see the evidence of the crimes Mueller is charging them with.
1 posted on
06/13/2018 9:18:00 AM PDT by
detective
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: detective
Bobby can always look for work in Waco.
32 posted on
06/13/2018 10:22:57 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
To: detective
The judge should refer him to the Bar for disbarment.
34 posted on
06/13/2018 10:35:19 AM PDT by
dinodino
To: detective
According to what he told the judge, he has no evidence!
35 posted on
06/13/2018 10:39:50 AM PDT by
Brown Deer
(America First!)
To: detective
From "The Trial" by Franz Kafka
But K. should not forget that the trial would not be public, if the court deems it necessary it can be made public but there is no law that says it has to be. As a result, the accused and his defence don't have access even to the court records, and especially not to the indictment, and that means we generally don't know - or at least not precisely - what the first documents need to be about, which means that if they do contain anything of relevance to the case it's only by a lucky coincidence. If anything about the individual charges and the reasons for them comes out clearly or can be guessed at while the accused is being questioned, then it's possible to work out and submit documents that really direct the issue and present proof, but not before. Conditions like this, of course, place the defence in a very unfavourable and difficult position. But that is what they intend. In fact, defence is not really allowed under the law, it's only tolerated, and there is even some dispute about whether the relevant parts of the law imply even that.
This must be Mueller's textbook from law school. (Sorry about the lack of paragrphs. My source was missing them.)
36 posted on
06/13/2018 10:46:37 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(I can't tell if we live in an Erostocracy (rule by sex) or an Eristocracy (rule by strife and chaos))
To: detective
Wouldn’t the evidence have to be presented in an open trial anyway or is it going to be a hush hush secret trial?
37 posted on
06/13/2018 10:48:38 AM PDT by
HenpeckedCon
(Covfefe Trump!)
To: detective
Torquemada ... the Inquisition’s grand Inquisitor.
One note samba- and uses the muh russians crapola to cover his rather profitable actions from all the way back thru GW Bush- and his “extension of office” that obamaumao got him.
The Tres Amigos..... Mueller, Comey and .... Rosenstein.
What basis for not letting a defendant see the evidence against them.... a normal part of discovery under our legal system.... cause these are “special” defendants? Are they— any body else you’d deny regular court process to, Mr. Stasi? He is more destructive of our Republic than the “russians” ever could be— unless of course HE is a Russian agent in place— his actions could be construed as such— the global get rich game.
39 posted on
06/13/2018 10:57:30 AM PDT by
John S Mosby
(SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS)
To: detective
Making up crimes against innocent civilians, threatening lawmakers, surpressing information. The DOJ has now become the US KGB.
43 posted on
06/13/2018 11:11:48 AM PDT by
HarleyD
To: detective
Now Mueller is saying that the defendants are not allowed to see the evidence of the crimes Mueller is charging them with. Are they supposed to accept that because they are Russian?
It sure isn't acceptable under American jurisprudence.
48 posted on
06/13/2018 12:48:56 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: detective
So he’s going to use secret evidence against them? How very Soviet of him.
55 posted on
06/13/2018 2:41:05 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(The ONLY purpose for gun control is so that one group can force its will on a less powerful group.)
To: detective
56 posted on
06/13/2018 2:54:32 PM PDT by
kanawa
(Trump Loves a Great Deal)
To: detective
Also:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3662779/posts
59 posted on
06/13/2018 4:04:21 PM PDT by
a little elbow grease
(Zip ties and duct tape are far more productive than pussy hats and #metoo tweets)
To: detective
Mueller is Trying to Keep Evidence from Defendants in Russian Trolls Case
First, Mueller is getting paid $1200.00 an hour and we need to find out who agreed to this ridiculous salary in Congress.
Second, who approved of the 13 Rat Lawyers getting paid a minimum of $500.00 an hour to around $1000.00 an hour.
We have not heard who approved of these salaries yet and we probably never will!!!
Paul Ryno who is a Never Trumper probably approved but he can not remember what he did yesterday.
What a joke Paul Ryno has turned out to be as the Speaker of the People's House. Paul Ryno needs to leave now as the Speaker of the People's House.
The Leadership of the Republican party is meeting behind closed doors and they are working out the DACA amnesty without giving us the details!!!
Any Republican who votes for this Bravo Sierra legislation in giving amnesty to these DACA recipients hopefully will lose their seats in Congress.
Again, the Republican leadership said they will be transparent in all their legislation but they are lying big time to their party and lying to the people of our great country.
To: detective
Is Mueller a lawyer? He should be disbarred.
62 posted on
06/13/2018 6:14:27 PM PDT by
virgil
(The evil that men do lives after them)
To: detective
This seems to emulate Italian prosecutors. Have we become Rome?
That’s a rhetorical question of course. We are Nuevo Roma. Truth? What is truth?
63 posted on
06/13/2018 9:56:15 PM PDT by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson