Posted on 06/26/2018 7:20:14 AM PDT by abb
Now he can ban beaners and anyone else he wants.
—
Is it possible to keep people in California?
:-)
tsk tsk tsk they are beside themselves.
I suspect more public triggering today by the bed wetters.
Followed shortly by MASS Deportation!
We’ve been on both sides of the 1 vote scuttling the constitution more times than I can count. SCOTUS is, really, a political body. I’ve little problem with that; but political actions from the bench demand political reactions from the other bodies.
Sotomayer & Ginsberg’s dissent is just a political screed; immediate impeachment should follow.
Next up, the showboaters in Congress scramble to pass a new law.
Yes, seems that way. Applying this court decision, Trump should take immediate steps to secure the Mexican border. Close it until Mexico can take responsibility for its citizens and those it lets into their country. Especially as they have a leading presidential candidate calling for invasion of the US, Trump should act.
You are correct there. McConnell gets a bad rap and sometimes deservedly so but he has done some incredibly good things for us over the last few years
True, but the tactic is to keep delaying or diluting the travel ban, with the hopes that the public will somehow side with the DEMs.
tsk tsk tsk they are beside themselves.
Ha! They sure are. CNN sounds like they’re covering a funeral.
AMEN!!
No. Nor harass them if they show up at the local Luau. Unfortunately.
So much winning!
(not tired of it!)
And yet, they have the final say in our country, with no checks and balances on their power.
I don't think the Founding Fathers intended it that way.
Andrew Jackson put a check on their power in practice. If he didn't like their ruling, he ignored it. Then, if Congress sided with the Court, Congress could always try to impeach and remove the President.
At least that was a check on the Supreme Court's power. Nowadays there's no check.
BUMP!
It’s a win, but it’s disheartening that it was a 5-4 decision. The minority opinion said that the ban gave “the appearance of discrimination”. Rather than vote on the actions of the administration, the minority justices voted on the appearance they thought they saw.
That’s not law, that’s “stick a finger in the air” judging. Those 4 justices ought to be ashamed of themselves, but without a conscience, there can be no shame.
In the voice of Lee Corso: "not so fast my friend!" The SC decision seems to center on the legislative language of the ability to vett applicants for entry. Trump still must follow the Congressional intent/language found in legislation. The ruling does not grant the President absolute power over immigration.
As to the invasion of our southern border, the president's powers will be challenged and litigated because of once again, Congressional intent/language in various laws.
The SC decision is still a win for Trump and our causs.
TRUMPS POWER NOW UNFETTERED!! Our National security at stake on the following basis. `1, criminals 2, drugs 3. welfare and health care in the billions 3, feeding and housing these illegal alien children cost $36,000 per person and per year!!. That my friends is a threat to NATIONAL SECURITY!! I pray for an order on the Mexican border by Sun Down!!
“This should bode well for the case to build the wall as well”
The ruling reaffirms the President calls the shots for the National Security of the USA. Are tens of thousands of deaths a year from Mexican smuggled Fentenyl a National security issue? Sure is as far as I’m concerned.
Other than the crossing of Commerce, shut down the boarders until the Rats blink and fully fund the Wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.