Posted on 06/28/2018 9:44:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Build a wall.
RE: Build a wall.
This article is not about the wall ( although you are right ).
...deportation without a trial is profoundly unconstitutional...
You’re kidding right?
ILLEGAL aliens ...
They’re not immigrants. They entered the country without authorization. They can be deported.
RE: They can be deported.
The issue is not whether or not they can be deported. The issue is -— Do they deserve a trail first?
Building a wall would make his point moot.
nap is saying illegal aliens have constitutional rights.
RE: Building a wall would make his point moot.
let’s assume that despite the Wall, some are actually able to get through anyway, what then?
Can they be deported without a trial?
RE: nap is saying illegal aliens have constitutional rights.
Yep, that’s in effect what he’s saying. True or false?
nap is a moron who is just about always wrong. I love the Eddie Munster hair, though.
When a burglar is caught in a house ...they dont keep him there and have the trial in the house. Have the trials in Mexico.
Wont be the first time the idiot napolitano is wrong. Thousands of illegal aliens are removed without trials. There is no constitutional guarantee of a trial for a foreign illegal. The only hearing an illegal is allowed by statute is whe asylum is claimed.
Napolitanos problem is he is an egocentric nut who has to make stupid outlandish claims to get back in the center of attention.
> Yet deportation without a trial is profoundly unconstitutional. <
Suppose there is a surge, and 10,000 illegals cross the border in a single day. Then tomorrow, another 10,000. Each and every one of them gets a trial? How is that even possible?
I disagree with the Judge here. The first thing is that there is no such thing as “Constitutional Rights”. The rights enumerated in the Constitution are God given natural rights. They are not rights granted by the government.
The U.S. Constitution requires the U.S. government protect the natural rights of U.S. Citizens. Now, judges may have set precedent over the years of making the U.S. govt. protector of the natural rights of non-citizens, but just because a Judge ruled on something does not make it law.
We are very tired of judges legislating from the bench and all of that folly needs to be overturned by judges who implement the law in their decisions, not “interpret” it to make it mean something not intended, i.e., the “anchor baby” interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
If Judge puts more credence in bad rulings by judges than the actual Constitution and law, he’s slipping over to the other side.
National security. State of emergency. Too bad.
Exactly, they are already illegal, that should be (and used to be) enough. Some just want to snarl things up so badly with illegals clogging courts, wasting time and money, that deporting them becomes an exercise in futility.
Invaders should be shot.
I don’t see how it is any different that releasing a POW.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.