How about we start with your money, hypocrite?
1 posted on
07/02/2018 2:57:13 PM PDT by
seanmerc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: seanmerc
Hey Richard, start with your money....my husband is 81 and still working. $1M would be a kind donation.
To: seanmerc
How the hell did this twit ever become rich?
I learned from an episode of Ducktales 30 years ago that this idea is stupid.
To: seanmerc
Richard Branson, you can jump up ** ***.
To: seanmerc
To: seanmerc
Branson knows damn well that if you give money to the poor, the rich will get it all back in no time.
27 posted on
07/02/2018 3:19:25 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: seanmerc
Richard Branson should give out free money in the ghettos until his income is equalized with the income of everyone in the ghettos.
29 posted on
07/02/2018 3:19:55 PM PDT by
arthurus
(er)
To: seanmerc
Bono agrees. As long as he doesn’t have to pay.
30 posted on
07/02/2018 3:20:14 PM PDT by
Old Yeller
(Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
To: seanmerc
How about we start with your money, hypocrite? Exactly. Why is it all these billionaires tell us to give away our own hard-earned money yet never offer theirs?
Taxing people who make $12/hr to give part of it to others who don't want to work is outright theft.
31 posted on
07/02/2018 3:20:26 PM PDT by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: seanmerc
Goofy as hell. Personification of rich, asskissing hypocrite.
32 posted on
07/02/2018 3:20:29 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(Call RedHen (540) 464-4401 and make no-show reservations)
To: seanmerc
He can get back to us after he’s given away 99% of his wealth for this cause.
He would still be rich and the 99% would have been squandered.
33 posted on
07/02/2018 3:21:48 PM PDT by
GnuThere
To: seanmerc
He is free to start doing that at any time.
No one is stopping him.
He could get a list of the thousand neediest families and start sending them checks tomorrow if he wanted to.
But... he doesn't want to.
He wants the government to take money at gun point from other people, those who might be challenging his role as king of the mountain.
His own personal money will be safe, he just has to pay off a politician or two.
What a slime ball.
35 posted on
07/02/2018 3:22:34 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( Bunnies, bunnies, it must be bunnies!! Or maybe midgets....)
To: seanmerc
Is that really Branson?
Now I know who Austin Powers was based on.
36 posted on
07/02/2018 3:23:57 PM PDT by
GnuThere
To: seanmerc
The only way to do that (and it wouldn’t be enough) is to strip every billionaire of every dollar or pound they’ve got and redistribute it.
How do such stupid people get so rich?
If I get a lobotomy will I start making piles of money?
37 posted on
07/02/2018 3:24:30 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: seanmerc
Love love LOVE President Trump’s actions in office so far... However, one of the reasons I was a Cruz guy in the Primaries was that I was deathly afraid that the electorate would start looking to celebrities and the hyper-rich for political leadership... and we could potentially get more guys in office like this one.
39 posted on
07/02/2018 3:26:36 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: seanmerc
No, British billionaire entrepreneur Richard Branson, you should give out free cash. BTW, do you hire accountants to reduce your taxes as much as possible?
41 posted on
07/02/2018 3:28:27 PM PDT by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victikms, and control freaks.)
To: seanmerc
42 posted on
07/02/2018 3:29:51 PM PDT by
Vlad The Inhaler
(Liberalism is the philosophy of sniveling brats. - P.J. ORourke)
To: seanmerc
Just twittered him. Told him ‘Hey I’m a 65-year-old guy dying of Emphysema, pay off my $45,000 mortgage”... Yeah, right.
43 posted on
07/02/2018 3:36:25 PM PDT by
heights
To: seanmerc
What do you think those in positions of power should do to address social problems like income inequality?Branson: "Hey, I"ve got a new and great idea. Let's again violate the Eight Commandment (You shall not steal) to once again break the Tenth Commandment (You shall not covet ... any thing that is your neighbor's) - all for political purposes and we will do it in the name of "compassion!"
That will probably work as well as it always has (i.e. it won't).
47 posted on
07/02/2018 3:40:59 PM PDT by
Gritty
(This is what the other side is all about. Hate and bullshit is their political platform.-DJ Trump Jr)
To: seanmerc
Early onset of senility - Exhibit 1.
To: seanmerc
Its a disgrace to see people sleeping on the streets with this material wealth all around them, Branson said.
People sleeping on the streets has nothing to do with "income inequality" or even a shortage of affordable housing, as is often claimed. Actual "sleeping on the streets" homelessness is quite rare, and largely the result of mental illness and drug abuse. "Basic income," which is one of the most economically illiterate ideas I've ever heard, will do absolutely nothing for these people.
Basic income is a problem in search of a solution. As Walter E. Williams recently pointed out, "There is virtually no material poverty in the U.S." Today, "poverty" is misleadingly defined in relative rather than absolute terms, labeling people as "impoverished" who are lacking none of life's necessities, have access to significant luxuries, and enjoy a standard of living greater than what would be considered "middle class" in most of the world.
Universal basic income would not cure poverty. It would just become the new standard of poverty, with constant demands for a "living UBI," just as we see with the minimum wage today.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson