Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WaPo: Brett Kavanaugh could drastically shift the court to the right. The Senate should take care.
Washington Post ^ | 07/09/2018 | Editorial Board

Posted on 07/09/2018 7:26:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Just like with talking head shows, the Left’s idea of balance is a large majority of dyed in the wool progressives, a moderate and maybe a moderate claiming to be a conservative.

The nattering flapdoodles of the Left know nothing of balance ... or of honoring oaths of office.

That’s because they are the imbalance personified.


21 posted on 07/09/2018 7:42:59 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Kavanaugh is entirely main stream.

Trouble is, NONE of the American NEWS MEDIA are main stream!

Lol! You are right on.

22 posted on 07/09/2018 7:44:44 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Washington Compost. Predictable editorial.


23 posted on 07/09/2018 7:45:11 PM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Well, it seems as though the WaPo has forgotten about The Biden Rule.
24 posted on 07/09/2018 7:46:05 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

The funny thing is that the Court has been an instrument of politics ever since FDR first convinced five of their number to screw over the American people, their oaths of office, and even the very nature of the sort of Republic we’d been up until that point.

All for Arbitrary governance.


25 posted on 07/09/2018 7:46:14 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And by “to the right” WaPo means “back from the precipice of Bolshevism.”


26 posted on 07/09/2018 7:46:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

In a word: “YES”!


27 posted on 07/09/2018 7:46:39 PM PDT by TaMoDee (Go Pack Go! The Pack will be back in 2018!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
They should insist on a justice who would rule with modesty and genuine independence of mind — and a willingness to resist abuses of power by this and future presidents.

Where was the ComPost editorial board during all of the rampant abuses of power by the Obama Admin? >>crickets<<

28 posted on 07/09/2018 7:46:48 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
Not this time!

They were going ti hate and attack ANYONE, far worse than they did Bork, no matter WHO it was. If Trump had picked a far lefty, they would have called him or her a NAZI and KKKer.

29 posted on 07/09/2018 7:47:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure this was written days ago.


30 posted on 07/09/2018 7:48:14 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The SCOTUS is not Congress.

The court is not a mini constitutional convention or a group of nine un-elected super legislatures.

SCOTUS job is to interpret law as written. Period.

This “fight” is nothing more than George Soros puppets with turn this country socialist orders.

The left is waging a political battle for an institution that is at its core non-political to turn it against us.

confirm. confirm. confirm.


31 posted on 07/09/2018 7:48:30 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Yet Mr. Kavanaugh came from a list of potential nominees preapproved by conservative activist groups. Their goal is to tilt the court as far right as possible as quickly as possible.

This apparently upsets Jeff Bezos, and his fellow marxists.
32 posted on 07/09/2018 7:48:44 PM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Nah. They would have pretended to oppose and let them pass, like they did with Souter and Rosenstein.


33 posted on 07/09/2018 7:49:18 PM PDT by Luke21 (The Hill sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
More than ever, the court is in danger of becoming viewed as an instrument of politics rather than an independent, nonpartisan branch of government. <<<

BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!...The only job of the SC is to “INTERPERT” the Constitution...not alter it!.....That job belongs to the Citizens and the Politicians they elect.......The Founding Fathers had to be divinely inspired...

34 posted on 07/09/2018 7:49:45 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!! What a giant steaming load from the WaPo. Gee, it wasn’t a partisan tool/plaything/battleground when Kennedy and Biden spewed all kinds of hateful crap about Robert Bork who was extremely highly qualified huh? It wasn’t that again when Kennedy tried to gin up a BS sexual harassment claim against Clarence Thomas huh? It wasn’t again when Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option to ram a nominee through just casting aside over 200 years of tradition in the Senate. Oh no, it was all just those mean ole Republicans preventing Obama’s nominee from coming up for a vote. THAT’s when it got “political”.

Everything is fair when the Democrats do it see?


35 posted on 07/09/2018 7:50:30 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

They just have sheer hate.

A generation ago, a judge like Kavanaugh would have been considered mainstream.

Now he’s viewed by the Leftist as “extremist” because their definition of what’s mainstream has changed.

We can’t have a serious discussion about judicial philosophy and the law because it’s controversial to liberals.

They are the ones, all protestations aside, who want a politicized judiciary.

Conservatives seek to safeguard its independence.


36 posted on 07/09/2018 7:50:52 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obviously the WaPo had this editorial pre-written. I’d like to read their other pre-written editorials on the other candidates.


37 posted on 07/09/2018 7:51:42 PM PDT by upchuck (As we head to the midterms, please (re)read Confessions of Congressman X - tinyurl.com/congressmanx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
Nope, not THIS time!

This craziness is even MORE nuts than at ANY other time in this nation's history.

38 posted on 07/09/2018 7:52:29 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

IMO a good & solid choice, now that I know more about him.

I saw an Axios chart where they rank Judge Kavanaugh to the right of Gorsuch and just left of Thomas (who was the right-most you could get). Compare that to ‘swing’ Judge Kennedy, and the court has potentially made a HUGE change to the conservative right.

Just imagine a President Hillary nominating Loretta Lynch say to the bench. What a miracle that we were saved from that!


39 posted on 07/09/2018 7:53:24 PM PDT by plushaye (Kat Kerr Presidential Prophecy: Trump (2 terms), Pence (2 terms), Pence's VP (2 terms))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"The Senate should take care."

And to take care is to confirm. Our Constitution and its effect should be restored and preserved as it was intended to do. And it's intents from this perspective are unarguably conservative (old fashioned) regardless of partisan and religious perspectives.


40 posted on 07/09/2018 7:53:43 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson