Democrats must consider court-packing when they regain power. It’s the only way to save democracy.

Wash Post ^ | 7-10-2018 | David Farls

[heshtesh]

The Dim’s have no leader, just a lot of hollering.

The moon’s not busy,it’ll listen!

[wmileo]

The ultra-Left are the one who want to use the court to limit actual rights guaranteed in the Constitution like the right to bear arms as well as other protections in the Bill of Rights.

Frankly I could care less about abortion and LGBT, etc. The can marry their McCall if they want to. The only time I am interested in what they do is if it cost me money as a taxpayer.

[ReleaseTheHounds]

So typical of Democrats: don’t get your way, change all the precedents, change the laws, change all the traditions. Even FDR couldn’t jam that court packing through.

[I want the USA back]

When a leftist says “democracy” he means savage repression and taking money from Whitey and giving it to non-Whitey.

[txrefugee]

Again betraying a total lack of knowledge of our history, they don’t know what happened when FDR tried that gambit.

[Shethink13]

What they really mean - it’s the only way to keep our leftist agenda from collapsing since the People by way of the vote would never let them become law.

[FiddlePig]

This is RICH... to “save democracy” (aka: DemWit power) you have to destroy it. North Korea is the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”. Modern American Dems use similar meanings for the word.

“Freedom is Slavery!”

[wbarmy]

AKA baby killing, fudge packing, and voter fraud.

So that no one blanches at using an off color phrase, I always say sodomy or sodomites now. I think it makes them more unhinged when they hear it.

[beekay]

Have not seen exactly what the threats are to the republic articulate anywhere. Seems more like another liberal emotional tag line.

[blackdog]

Let's not over react to a war room with the pasdwords to 800 Twitter accounts of popular leftist orgs, Hollywood barkers, and media liberals.

This crap is staged, centrally coordinated and commanded, and will tire out quickly.

[TXSearcher]

Americans have one word for your idea: NO

[FLT-bird]

LOL! First it would take a complete Democrat takeover of the House, the Senate and the White House. Their majorities would have to be large in both the House and Senate because you can guarantee it will be so wildly unpopular with the American people that several Democrats will oppose it. Then you have to ram them all through before the voters get the chance to punish you in the next election - because rest assured, they will.

But tell ya what......do keep talking about your plans to pack the Supreme Court If given the chance. We’ll see how that goes for you.

[Lee'sGhost]

I thought of the FDR fail as well. I’m wondering if the comPost article mentions it.

[cableguymn]

Rats should be blaiming the old libs on the court for not retiring during Obama’s term.

They thought Hillary would cheat her way to a win and hung around.

Not republicans fault

[bigbob]

AND Amnesty, Open Borders, legalizing FELONs to vote, and all their other nefarious ideas.

[nikos1121]

Sounds like a great idea to me. Let’s start it now? Raise the number to 11 and appoint 2 more conservative judges.

[a little elbow grease]

"AKA baby killing, fudge packing, and voter fraud."

_____________________

........ my owner is right ... Democrats are foul.

Now, when do we get to the park?

[Red Badger]

Typical Democrap behavior.

If you can’t win by the rules, change the rules............

[FLT-bird]

Uhhhh no it wouldn’t. Court packing is increasing the number of justices to alter its ideological make-up. Appointing a bunch of justices is not court packing. It’s just good fortune.

[A_Former_Democrat]

Anyone else notice the irony of “packing the court” to “save ‘our’ democracy”?