1 posted on
07/23/2018 12:07:54 PM PDT by
seanmerc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: seanmerc
It’s a start. While he is at it, how about running an initial security clearance on Hussien? That I would like to see.....
54 posted on
07/23/2018 12:29:41 PM PDT by
Envisioning
(Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
To: seanmerc
Better late than never. This should have already been done. Good grief.
To: seanmerc
Sounds like a DEEP STATE PERK. Kill it already!
60 posted on
07/23/2018 12:41:55 PM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: seanmerc
If they no longer work for the Government, WTF would they still have their security clearance?
Could someone with knowledge in this area enlighten me?
To: seanmerc
If he does this, does that mean that any of them in possession of classified material can be arrested?
I mean arrested if they can’t show intent and are just grossly negligent...
65 posted on
07/23/2018 12:47:33 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
To: seanmerc
DO. IT.
To: seanmerc
The retained security clearance is the bedrock of the "revolving door" between government and private industry. Trump should issue an E.O. simply stating that security clearances should terminate immediately upon leaving Federal employment and need to be re-applied for (possibly on an expedited basis) on an as-needed basis thereafter.
Any security clearance granted to political appointees should certainly terminate immediately upon end of service.
68 posted on
07/23/2018 12:49:38 PM PDT by
AustinBill
(consequence is what makes our choices real)
To: seanmerc
Mueller just went out of business your on your own boy.
71 posted on
07/23/2018 12:51:33 PM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
To: seanmerc
72 posted on
07/23/2018 12:52:12 PM PDT by
HollyB
To: seanmerc
77 posted on
07/23/2018 12:58:38 PM PDT by
heights
To: seanmerc
Why should any congressman, senator, government official, or even President, retain their security clearance after they are out of office. What would they need it for?
To: seanmerc
Rand Paul tweeted just a little while ago that he had just talked to the President on revoking John Brennan’s security clearance.
I’m so glad that he feels strongly about this, I just wonder where are all of the other Republicans.
John Brennan is truly a scary person with a heart full of hatred for President Trump.
He has openly threatened him and should be imprisoned, much less have access to our Intel.
To: seanmerc
Looking.just do it. No one who leaves should have it
91 posted on
07/23/2018 2:01:36 PM PDT by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
To: seanmerc
93 posted on
07/23/2018 2:15:38 PM PDT by
JLAGRAYFOX
(Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
To: seanmerc
President Trump can't do this fast enough for the security of the Oval Office and America. Brennan's vitriol against the Trump administration, not to mention President Trump himself, provides extreme danger for POTUS....Ntl Security Advisor Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, and all Hillary's State Dept henchmen/computer gurus .....Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin plus all ex-presidents of the USA...why would they need such a clearance....Bill and Hillary should not even be close to such a security clearance...we know they sold parts of their nation to the highest bidder.
Brenner working for Obama is a dangerous combo for this POTUS. Valerie Jarrett is heading up Obama's OAF which is part of the "Shadow Government" whose aim now is to disrupt President Trump's efforts for America. Who controls Barack Obama you might ask....we know NO ONE controls President Trump.
99 posted on
07/23/2018 2:58:45 PM PDT by
yoe
To: seanmerc
I think this is about something more than what it looks like on the surface. Not sure what, but POTUS doesnt do anything by chance or for frivolous reasons. There is something coming down the pike on these guys.
103 posted on
07/23/2018 3:17:20 PM PDT by
McGavin999
("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jeffersons)
To: seanmerc
Just another stupid insane thing the gubment does.
Why the hell do they have a clearance and get any information after they have left the jobs and gubment service?
104 posted on
07/23/2018 3:22:21 PM PDT by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
To: seanmerc
“Top, top, top, top, top”, always used to describe deep state cretins.
114 posted on
07/23/2018 3:56:07 PM PDT by
Luke21
(The Hill sucks.)
To: Donald J Trump
117 posted on
07/23/2018 4:58:44 PM PDT by
DAVEY CROCKETT
(Thank you Free Republic. Thank you President Donald J Trump, Greatest election Ever.)
To: seanmerc; All
Don’t forget Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
Anyway, FORMER officials, don’t need to continue to have clearance......especially traitorous scumbags like these.
All that has come from them continuing to have this clearance, are leaks to the MSM
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson