Posted on 08/13/2018 12:33:43 PM PDT by servo1969
you’re completely wrong. drejka never saw mcglockton coming. How is it remotely possible that drejka started the fight?
talking to the woman in the car is not even part of the equation; has nothing to do with being attacked.
LOL. it is so annoying reading posts from people like you who have zero facts but aren’t shy about creating their own. the guy wasn’t screaming at the woman. there was no audio but even the sheriff said there were no threats at all. and, if she was such a victim, why did she get out of the car to confront drejka when the thug came out of the store??
It’s very disturbing that people like you are on a conservative website, portraying yourself as one when you’re not.
You talk big don’t you?
If you’re lucky you’ll live as long as I have. But it sounds like it may take that long for you to realize that not everyone is an Arnold Schwarzenegger
Bullcrap. You come out and find some guy cussing your woman as she was sitting in the car you wouldn’t shove him away?
If the roles were reversed and mcglockton was cussing and confronting drejka’s wife, everyone would cheer if he shoved him away and we both know it.
Meant to reply to yo-yo. Sorry
Dude.... Mcglockton had a previous felony arrest for beating the crap out of his girlfriend and resisting arrest with violence. Besides.... the woman got out of the car and got in Drejka’s face. We don’t know that Drejka was cussing. There is no audio on the video and I’m certainly not going to believe the word of a woman who was illegally parked in a handicapped space and cavorting with a violent criminal.
I see it the same way. for the record though, I don’t see the parking spot as even part of the issue. It should be completely excluded and the assault only considered as the even that caused the self defense. Everything else is white noise.
oh, cussing now, eh? so you were there and heard it? Because none of us, including the police,have heard anything since there’s no audio. you’re showing yourself to be completely agenda driven instead of fact driven.
any of us should be entitled to say anything to anyone without fear of attack. Period. The thug is the aggressor and paid for it with his life.
> “The one who “started the fight” is dead and buried.”
Wrong.
I was taught that a person carrying a weapon has a legal duty NOT to provoke others.
Good deal
Presuming you're a reasonable person, that won't be the issue. The issue will revolve around the provocation. You can't provoke a fight without the risk of liability should it escalate to a point where you were in fear of your life. Worse yet, it appears there are incidents in the past of this individual provoking arguments over the parking space, and threatening parkers. And possibility an incident in which he waved a firearm.
I would not provoke an incident like that when armed. I acknowledge that the distance was such that I would consider an angry young man larger than younger than me a threat. And look at the video. After being thrown down but prior to drawing his weapon another young man in a blue tshirt approaches him. Then flees when he sees the weapon. That man in the blue t shirt is a threat as well.
High five
Anyone can go on YouTube and watch street fights or batters charging the mound or hockey and so forth
Almost none end in somebody shooting someone who hits them or puchses them down
He’ll id need to put graveyard in my horse pasture for all those I’d shot if I had acted that way from all my fights
Again I salute u
What before you can kill them?
Stupid question
You don’t kill anyone for pushing you down
Unless you’re a coward or you have life threatening scoliosis
Know-it-alls like you have their own opinion and no amount of viewing a broader picture will allow you to see the facts.
Just because you can’t HEAR yelling on the video doesn’t mean it wasn’t happening.
Look at the people going in and out of the store!
If it was just a casual conversation, do you think those other people would be watching the action?
The white guy looks to me like he alerted her husband that she was being accosted in the parking lot. At about that time, she gets out. I am assuming so she won’t be a sitting duck if he tried to do something.
Conservatism certainly is not badgering people with whom you disagree - but making lucid statements of fact or opinion with something to back it up.
Maybe it is you who isn’t the true conservative!
And I’ve been around here long enough to know that people like you are just bigmouths with nothing but bluster. Go take a breath.
and it doesn’t mean it was! libtards make up facts, not conservatives. So you either admit you don’t know what the hell was said or how it was said or you’re not a conservative. I guess it never crossed your mind that it could have been HER screaming that caused people to look, if in fact they were looking at what’s going on.
The attacker was advancing until Drejka drew the gun. He fired two seconds after he pulled the gun. One kick to the head from the attacker and Drejka could have been killed. The attacker Mcglockton has a history of violence with prior felony arrests. Something CBS “News” failed to mention after delving into Drejka’s past.
It’s clear on the CCTV that he is ragging her out.
PLUS he has a history of being a busy-body about handicapped spaces. Wouldn’t be surprised he is laying it on.
And, she being a Thuggette, is probably giving it right back. But BusyBody keeps going because he is holier-than-thou.
Not saying BusyBody should’ve been knocked to the ground, but also saying I’m not sure Thug should’ve been shot.
There is a lot of talk about provocation.
The fact of the matter is, all the way from getting the wrong order at a fast food drive-thru, to being asked to be quiet at a movie, we know that certain recognizable people are provoked very easily.
We should have picked our own damn cotton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.