Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rough Beasts Slouching toward the White House
American Thinker ^ | September 9, 2018 | Clarice Feldman

Posted on 09/09/2018 9:37:19 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Kickass Conservative

Federal revenues are down sharply every month but April, which again reflects payments due April 15 under the prior tax code. Next year will be far worse still.


21 posted on 09/10/2018 10:52:48 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Interesting, I had not heard that. I’ll have to check that out.

Another reason to visit Free Republic, access to information.


22 posted on 09/10/2018 12:12:53 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ArGee

My point was that we should NOT be scoring tax rate cuts based on their revenue neutrality, or conversely, on their debt neutrality.

We should instead be scoring tax cuts on what I call “government burden neutrality”. This is because it is the level of government spending that burdens the private economy, regardless of whether that spending is financed by taxation or by borrowing.

As long as spending remains the same, tax hikes and tax cuts merely shift the burden from a tax burden to a debt burden - the burden remains unchanged.

I still advocate tax cuts though if that is the will of the people, because that is an honest measure of what the people are willing to spend on government. The deficit spending is the amount being spent AGAINST the will of the people.

I like the idea of keeping the two straight - it exposes the government as the theives they are. Maybe with that awareness there is a slight chance of reigning in the government. If we raise taxes to cover it, then there is zero chance of a cut in spending.

To me it’s like a teenage kid asking for an increase in his allowance, and when the parents say no, the kid says “OK then I’ll run up debt on credit cards and maybe later you’ll have to bail me out of debt”. This is when the parents should say “No, if you exceed your allowance and run up debt, you’re kicked out of the house”. If they are weak, and agree to increasing the allowance because they fear the teenager will run up debt, they are like the “fiscal conservatives” who will raise taxes to avoid debt. It’s a capitulation.


23 posted on 09/10/2018 3:19:18 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

I agree with you 100%. The way to keep expenses within revenues is to cut expenses, not raise revenues.

I also agree that taxes should be used to generate revenue - ONLY. Not to encourage certain behaviors.


24 posted on 09/14/2018 12:52:05 PM PDT by ArGee (I trust people with freedom more than I trust government with power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson