Skip to comments.
Perjury hedge? Sure starting to look that way with Kavanaugh's two accusers
American Thinker ^
| September 24, 2018
| Monica Showalter
Posted on 09/24/2018 11:28:16 AM PDT by detective
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
This is an excellent article.
All of the three people named as witnesses in the incident, including the female, Leland Keyser, sent letters to the Senate, under oath, as did Kavanaugh.
None of Kavanaugh's accusers are willing to testify or provide any information under oath.
1
posted on
09/24/2018 11:28:16 AM PDT
by
detective
To: nutmeg
2
posted on
09/24/2018 11:29:11 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: detective
I may be wrong about this, but I believe a prospective witness in a Senate committee hearing can't even walk in the door without sending a sworn statement to the committee in advance ... just so the committee members would know why the hell the witness is even there in the first place.
3
posted on
09/24/2018 11:31:15 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
To: detective
4
posted on
09/24/2018 11:31:29 AM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: detective
They can hedge perjury all they want but they are dead to rights on defamation, both civil and criminal sides.
5
posted on
09/24/2018 11:33:18 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 1)
To: detective
But there is a big one: the fact that she sent her letter accusing Kavanaugh to Rep. Anna Eshoo, who sits in a House seat of no importance to the Senate confirmation and didn't send it to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who sits in a Senate seat of significant importance. Hasn't this been debunked? The July 30th letter that I've seen posted in unredacted form clearly lists Dianne Feinstein as the intended recipient.
6
posted on
09/24/2018 11:34:03 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
To: thoughtomator
We may be at the point where a compelling case can be made that Ford and Feinstein are effectively engaging in blackmail.
7
posted on
09/24/2018 11:35:22 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
To: Alberta's Child
If we assume a political gain qualifies, it meets the definition of blackmail perfectly.
8
posted on
09/24/2018 11:40:15 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 1)
To: detective
If the can get Ford under oath, then they should ask her what her mode of conveyance was when she travelled from Delaware to California in August.
Surely these Senators have the pull to get TSA and the airlines to pull travel records?!
To: detective
10
posted on
09/24/2018 11:45:28 AM PDT
by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
To: SERKIT
Your find. You post a thread. This is gold.
11
posted on
09/24/2018 11:48:01 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: detective
Neither of these incidents would have seen the inside of a courtroom had we been dealing with an effective legal system - since we’re looking at lying thug ‘rats desperate to hang on the last assured seat of power they have, the Supreme Court, we’re seeing a kangaroo court a la Josef Stalin.....
To: Alberta's Child
At this point l dont trust any of the letters we ar see. Who knows what the original one said.
To: Alberta's Child
Hasn't this been debunked? The July 30th letter that I've seen posted in unredacted form clearly lists Dianne Feinstein as the intended recipient.
Was it addressed to DiFi by Ford or Eshoo? The font at the top of the letter was a different size than the rest of the letter. That is what I read on another thread.
14
posted on
09/24/2018 12:10:00 PM PDT
by
Know et al
( Keep on Freepin'!!!)
To: detective
I would really like Judge Kavanaugh to make the clear and loud announcement, that he intends to file criminal and civil charges for defamation and slander against his accusers.
15
posted on
09/24/2018 12:14:22 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
To: Alberta's Child
Doesn’t matter if it’s sworn or not. Doesn’t matter if appearance before the committee is sworn it not. The same part of the US code applies to making false statements to Congress as it does to the FBI.
16
posted on
09/24/2018 12:16:39 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward 5th Avenue to be born?)
To: detective
AND-—IF Feinstein passed on a ‘letter’ to Grassley that had been tampered with—a different FONT in one paragraph—that would be TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE.
Feinstein has to face charges for doing such.
To: detective
None of Kavanaugh’s accusers are willing to testify or provide any information under oath.
As if any of Kavanaugh’s “accusers” have anything to fear from the doormat beltway GOP.
18
posted on
09/24/2018 1:21:40 PM PDT
by
lodi90
To: detective
None of Kavanaugh’s accusers are willing to testify or provide any information under oath.
As if any of Kavanaugh’s “accusers” have anything to fear from the doormat beltway GOP.
19
posted on
09/24/2018 1:21:41 PM PDT
by
lodi90
To: FredZarguna
It would be nice to see a few Democrats be in trouble over this.
Well, I can dream.
20
posted on
09/24/2018 1:22:56 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson