Posted on 10/04/2018 9:30:01 AM PDT by davikkm
We need a 2 year, open-ended Mueller-style investigation, that we can stack with Democrats, and where we can have SWAT raids on anyone connected to Kavanaugh, dig through their taxes, emails, coerce corroboration, etc...
You know - do this investigation properly!
How many times can Kavanaugh be investigated? Do people who run the silly t.v. programs think everyone is stupid? They are looking foolish with their intentional smears. They must be trying to earn a paycheck from their Soros funded group.
No more Chuck you’ve had enough. But keep doing it as it no doubt will drive your party’s numbers down.
“It’s not an open ended witch hunt! waaah waaah” — Chucky Schumer
An investigation the Democrats themselves demanded is now called “limited.” Pinch me.
Because the facts are clear and the Rats simply didn’t like the facts.
That’s all there is to it.
Like the minnesota dummocraps finding all the votes.
“This is what Schmuck Chumer has done from the beginning.... moving the goal post... He knows he has nothing... but he keeps playing the bluff.’
But that is all the left requires.
--------------
Or a bad dose of the clap?
That works for either side. If I'd testified under oath I wouldn't want to be interviewed again when the slightest misstatement could lead to charges.
Chuck you, schmuck!
The facts are in. This was a Deep State hit.....in spades.
Watch the ants scurry for cover....
There is one FBI report to only be seen by 100 senators and POTUS.
How does schumer know what it says?
If Sherlock Holmes, Joe Friday and Hercule Poirot ran the investigation Schumer wouldn’t be satisfied with it.
I personally think an investigatory anal exam on the drinking and sex habits of Democrats while attending Ivy League schools would be quite entertaining.
At this point, I’d almost like to see Trump tweet something like “If you think the democrats are hard on Kavanaugh, wait’ll you see what they do when I nominate Amy Coney Barrett after RBG croaks!”
If you’re going to try to destroy a person’s reputation, based on something that happened when both of you were in high school, then you should at least be able to find some friends and classmates from your high school years to vouch for your character, if there’s no other evidence to support your claims.
Where are all of Chrissie’s old friends? The fact that she told the prosecutor at the hearing “I spoke to Leland and she believes me” is quite telling. Why doesn’t Leland put out a statement saying that she trusts that her old friend is telling the truth? Why hasn’t anyone else that she knew back in ‘82?
Hey, Chucky! Let’s revisit your sexual assault on that young staffer of yours which the (Dem-controlled) Senate Ethics Committee refused to hear. Like you said: Who are you going to believe, a young staff girl or a US Senator? For me, when you’re involved, the young girl every time. Also, what about the abuse charges against Keith Ellison? If you and the Dems are so holier than thou, why isn’t he being investigated by the committee?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.