Skip to comments.
Kagan warns that Supreme Court may not have a swing vote anymore
The Hill ^
| 10/05/18
| JUSTIN WISE
Posted on 10/05/2018 7:01:04 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-204 next last
If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes.
To: yesthatjallen
2
posted on
10/05/2018 7:02:34 PM PDT
by
sevlex
To: yesthatjallen
From Kagan's mouth to God's ears …
3
posted on
10/05/2018 7:02:45 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' babies!)
To: yesthatjallen
She should quit if it bothers her so.
4
posted on
10/05/2018 7:03:26 PM PDT
by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
To: yesthatjallen
The law is the law - no “swing” votes needed or wanted.....
To: yesthatjallen
“Kagan warns that Supreme Court may not have a swing vote anymore”
That's kind-of what we are working for.
To: yesthatjallen
“It’s not so clear, that I think going forward, that sort of middle position — it’s not so clear whether we’ll have it,” Kagan said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is an idea from a white uneducated deplorable, follow the Constitution ( read it sometime, it’s pretty cool ) and follow the law.
To: yesthatjallen
8
posted on
10/05/2018 7:04:19 PM PDT
by
vmpolesov
To: yesthatjallen
Associate Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said Friday she fears the high court may lack a justice going forward who would serve as a swing-vote on cases There isn't supposed to be a swing vote. Just 9 justices supporting the Constitution.
9
posted on
10/05/2018 7:04:28 PM PDT
by
NutsOnYew
To: yesthatjallen
The court jester squeaks.....
10
posted on
10/05/2018 7:04:35 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
To: yesthatjallen
I’m sure the left will be outraged at her blatantly partisan and inappropriate comments unworthy of a supreme Court Justice and demand her impeachment.
To: yesthatjallen
12
posted on
10/05/2018 7:04:57 PM PDT
by
keving
(We the government)
To: yesthatjallen
She sounds awfully partisan there.
13
posted on
10/05/2018 7:05:02 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: yesthatjallen
Said by Kagan, who invariably swings the other way.
14
posted on
10/05/2018 7:05:12 PM PDT
by
Pearls Before Swine
("It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
To: yesthatjallen
So now they’re using these evil witches as their last desperate try to derail SC JUSTICE KAVANUAGH...justice kavanuagh GOSH that sounds so awesome!!
To: yesthatjallen
Nothing is stopping her from ruling like O’Connor...other than hating America the way it was founded and all.
16
posted on
10/05/2018 7:05:36 PM PDT
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(We need a consent decree for the FBI like Obama was slapping on all those police agencies.)
To: yesthatjallen
Shut your pie hole, Kaka. The only reason you’re on the court is because Obozo wanted a dyke on the bench.
17
posted on
10/05/2018 7:05:40 PM PDT
by
50mm
To: yesthatjallen
Two words....John Roberts.
18
posted on
10/05/2018 7:05:54 PM PDT
by
HChampagne
(Cruz supporter but I will support and vote for Trump.)
To: yesthatjallen
If justices followed the Constitution there would be no swing votes.
Exactly.
To: yesthatjallen
She all buy admits she’s a farr left hack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-204 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson