Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Professors Launch Campaign To Pack Supreme Court After Kavanaugh Confirmation
Fox News ^ | 10-16-2018 | Gregg Re

Posted on 10/16/2018 7:40:01 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: blam

almost strange to see this article after I just posted yesterday, about how punative the Northern elites were to the South during/post Civil War that has carried on through today, but here we are.

So a question:
just how ‘political’ are professors whose institutions accept federal funding allowed to be? Alternately, if an institution claims federal tax-exempt status, how ‘political’ are professors allowed to be before the institution loses its tax-exempt status? And does the below caption qualify as hate speech?

“marginalizing those Republican “losers,” whom he compared to the defeated Japanese in World War II or the Confederacy in the Civil War”

2011;
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/harvard-got-56m-federal-student-loans-and-grants-despite-its-317b-tax-exempt-endowment


21 posted on 10/16/2018 8:56:23 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar
Or we can just keep the system we have now... we've finally got control of the Presidency, House, Senate, Supreme Court, most State Legislatures and most Governorships...

The reason we're winning is because democrats are sleazy little losers... who cheat. Why imitate them?

22 posted on 10/16/2018 8:59:11 PM PDT by GOPJ (Democrats protect MS-13, Open Borders and Criminals. Our side wants JOBS NOT MOBS....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Valid points.


23 posted on 10/16/2018 9:01:04 PM PDT by piytar (If it was not for double standards, the Democrats and the left would have NO standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

President Trump should tweet out their argument, a link to their site, and the words “Great Idea! I have lots of fantastic people to nominate!” and watch the court packing movement did a quick death.


24 posted on 10/16/2018 9:05:29 PM PDT by WMarshal (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

The court-packing idea is just the dumbest of dumb ideas, and it’s a sad commentary on the idiocy of the left’s “Harvard intelligentsia” that they can’t see the obvious inherent flaws in the plan. To think that court-packing is a good idea is to assume that, once your side does it, the other side will never be in a position to retaliate. And how naive and dumb is that? As much as I’d love it if the Dems never again controlled the presidency and congress, anyone with any sense of history knows that there are pendulum swings and it’s unrealistic to think that your side will never be shut out of power. It’s happened many times before and it will likely happen again.


25 posted on 10/16/2018 9:18:43 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

I don’t like the idea of only 9 SC justices. There should be 25 and they should all be nominated and confirmed in the next 2 years.


26 posted on 10/16/2018 9:25:47 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

#19. You raise a good technical point about “Far-Left Harvard professors”.

I read the whole list of those who opposed Judge Kavanaugh’s appointment and could only find a handful who could be considered “communists/Marxists” in the traditional sense.

Lacking were key Communist Party elderly lawyers, the major leaders of the CPUSA’s old front, the National Lawyers Guild, the CP’s very important legal front, the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee (NECLC), and the NLG’s creation, the assorted Marxists/communists/progressives “Center for Constitutional Rights”.

This NY Times opinion piece/ad or whatever, features newer liberals/leftists whose names have not appeared in most radical papers or at events. They are a new “wave” or “generation” of law students/lawyers who were taught by the old CPUSA lawyers (Emerson, Kinoy, Siegle, Kunstler, Fagan, and their as yet unidentified colleagues, Countryman, Askins, those from the Marxist National Conference of Black Lawyers, and a few from La Raza).

This makes them more dangerous since you cannot legally identify them as members of the CPUSA or any other communist/Marxist party-organization unless they have been publicly identified as such, or their names have appeared with such affiliations in radical publications/books, etc.

Many of them as just damned fool liberals who think it is cool to subvert, undermine and destroy the Constitution and our internal security/criminal organizations laws. THAT IS WHERE THE DANGER LIES. This new group is young, lean and hungry, just like “Cassius” at Caesar’s back.

They have no concept or knowledge of how communism/Marxism and the fake “progressivism” works or their ultimate goals of subverting America into a hardcore Marxist country (Obama tried, believe me, his “fundamental transformation of American” wasn’t about defending the Constitution, as Eric Holder, his far-left hitman just let out of the bag when he said about conservatives/Republicans, “If they go low, you kick them”. Typical red street thug in a suit.
Oh, and he was the Attorney General of the United States despite being a black racist, reparationist and Marxist.

At least these no-so-stupid attorneys have given us a nice list with which to create a “Radical Lawyers Watch List” so when they pop up at some leftist affair, in some radical publication, or on TV, we will know who they are and can write blogs/letters/call in shows, etc. exposing them for who they really are, America’s enemies, knowingly or dupedily. Either way, they are still the enemy, and this new group with Tribe, Tushnet etc, are another perhaps far more dangerous group of far-left attorneys who are now going to get on another “Far-Left Dangerous Attorneys List” for all to see.

If any FReepers have good articles or sources of information about them, please post it here at FR for all to see, share, and spread around. Knowledge is one of our best defenses against this new wave of “mini-Marxists and red stooges”.


27 posted on 10/16/2018 9:40:05 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

The number 1024 comes to mind for some reason . How about 1024 judges on the Court...appointed before Jan???


28 posted on 10/16/2018 9:44:41 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Blah; All

Democrats govern through judicial tyranny.


29 posted on 10/16/2018 9:53:30 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

“Just wait for the Leftist meltdown when President Trump gets to appoint replacements for some of the Gang of Four.”

Ruth Buzzy was lookin’ “less than wonderful” at Kavanaugh’s Confirmation.


30 posted on 10/16/2018 10:24:30 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic is one stop shopping...It's the super Walmart for news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Difference is, even the Democrats in the US Senate,voted against FDR’s attempt to pack The Supreme Court with New far left judges. Can you in your heart, even imagine the current deranged Democrats in the US Senate ever voting against an attempt by say a President Kamala Harris to pack the Supreme Court with far left liberals? I can’t.
Bottom line: We have to make sure the Democrats don’t get control of the US Senate, not even in 2024. That shouldn’t be too hard.
31 posted on 10/16/2018 10:36:45 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Difference is, even the Democrats in the US Senate,voted against FDR’s attempt to pack The Supreme Court with New far left judges. Can you in your heart, even imagine the current deranged Democrats in the US Senate ever voting against an attempt by say a President Kamala Harris to pack the Supreme Court with far left liberals? I can’t.
Bottom line: We have to make sure the Democrats don’t get control of the US Senate, not even in 2024. That shouldn’t be too hard.
32 posted on 10/16/2018 10:36:51 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Democrat Party is like a homicidal lover.

It says to America it strangles her, “If we can’t have you, nobody will.”


33 posted on 10/16/2018 11:02:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

**** Merrick Garland! The boy is an anti-constitution retard! Now that he’s never going to be on the SCOTUS, he might has well apply for a job as a “fries guy” at a fast food joint.


34 posted on 10/16/2018 11:11:07 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Larry Tribe needs to stick to packing his buddy, Mark’s Tushnet.


35 posted on 10/16/2018 11:17:05 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

When liberal Democrats lose the game, they change the rules so they win.


36 posted on 10/16/2018 11:31:33 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I look forward to President Trump picking RBG’s replacement with a GOP Senate. I think I’ll start stocking up on popcorn now.


37 posted on 10/16/2018 11:35:37 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
"Or we can just keep the system we have now... we've finally got control of the Presidency, House, Senate, Supreme Court, most State Legislatures and most Governorships... The reason we're winning is because democrats are sleazy little losers... who cheat. Why imitate them?"

Exactly.

No reason to imitate these losers when you are winning.

38 posted on 10/17/2018 12:38:39 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blam
1.20.21 Project

Ignoring this has no shot of happening even if the Democrats win, isn't this just strangely cocking coming from someone that got so burned by the 2016 results? What happens if Trump wins re-election in November 2020, are they going to kill themselves?

39 posted on 10/17/2018 12:44:29 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

*cocky


40 posted on 10/17/2018 12:45:54 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson