Posted on 11/19/2018 4:22:30 PM PST by Kaslin
The 14th (especially) and the 6th are much more important because we SHOULD (14th) and CAN (6th) win them back.
Hultgren better fade away.
I except Oberweis might run for the 14th. And I suppose I could live with that after his respectable Senate performance in 2014.
Bit of good news I didn't mention, Rock Island County State Senator Neil Anderson (our ONLY leg gain from 2014) narrowly won reelection. He lost Rock Island County but did well enough in the rest of the district (most of Whiteside, some of Carrol and Henry) to eke it out.
California Republicans must have smoking some good stuff to prefer John Cox over Travis Allen. Let's see... Candidate "A" is a proven conservative assemblyman and lifelong California resident who has won repeatedly in an ethnically diverse district that voted for Hillary. Candidate "B" is a carpetbagger from Illinois who ran half a dozen vanity campaigns where he never even came CLOSE to winning, and managed to come in LAST place and get around 0.08% of the Iowa caucus vote when he ran a laughable "campaign" for President. And oh yeah, he was a NeverTrumper who voted for Gary Johnson and vehemently opposed building a wall along the Mexican border, and opposes the death penalty in all circumstances. Well, no question, let's nominate candidate "B"!
I'm guessing some useful idiots who confused John Cox with CHRIS Cox might be the reason he was nominated. Every time I confronted his fan club with facts about why Cox was a weaker choice than Allen, the response was "you just want the Democrat to win. We GOTTA get behind Cox to STOP that!!"
As for Illinois, you had the "being a RINO magically makes him ELECTABLE in a state like this!" crowd, who completely ignored the fact that Rauner's approval ratings were in the toilet and he was literally the LEAST popular Republican governor in the country running for re-election. They honestly belived that even though poll after poll showed Illinois voters loathed him overall, they'd have a "come to Jesus" moment at the last minute and switch to Rauner solely by virtue of him being Democrat lite. The fact the RATs ran a completely tainted crook and he STILL beat Rauner in a landslide just shows you how weak Rauner was.
Had Travis Allen and Jeanne Ives being the respective GOP nominee in their states, I don't think the damage to their state parties would have been nearly as bad. They'd still have a huge uphill battle and would have almost certainly lost running in an entrenched RAT state during a RAT "wave" election, but they would provided an actual fight against the RAT and gotten decent numbers.... Allen would have probably ended up with around 46% to Newsom's 54%, for example.
A
B
Yes, I agree. I’ve thought about who else could be appointed, but there is no Arizona R who is even remotely conservative who would be viewed as acceptable. Not Ward, not Joe, not JD Hayworth, not Shadegg.
I’m told Gosar does not have the “fire in the belly” and really doesn’t pursue a higher office.
BTW, there is (as you might expect) a battle for the AZ GOP chairman’s job. Honestly, I don’t know what to make of Jonathan Lines. He seemed perhaps overly optimistic, then soured on Marquez Peterson (but I’m not sure why-—again hear stories she didn’t work all that hard). I can’t tell if he knew the #s or not. I hope to meet with him next week.
I voted early at Downers Grove Village Hall since I would be out of town on election day. Didn’t need to give a reason. I stayed in my voting booth to make sure the paper ballot print-out matched my touch-screen screen hits. Were these the kind of machine that were suspect in 2016? I recall the Downers Site had reports of Trump votes counting as Hillary votes. DuPage is now a vast wasteland.
I think Connelly may be damaged goods based on bad leadership at the village and county levels. He did OK in the State House and Senate, but he came across as a fast ladder-climber that did not take care of details in his wake.
Well, I put “lost” in quotes for a reason, my point in mentioning it was that I can believe some small ticket splitting occurred between well off suburbanites that hate Trump and want a rat Congress to harass him but don’t want Mr. San Fran to be the their tax-happy Governor, so I can buy Cox doing a little better in the OC than the Congressional candidates.
The Issa seat is the only one in the state that MIGHT be a legit rat gain. The other Rs (IIRC, Dana R might have been slightly down) all lead after the actual election day ballots were counted (and rat Ami Bera wasn’t winning by much)
You may have noticed polls actually underestimated rat performance in Cali and Nevada, another indication of fraud (and it was the same thing in 2016).
I should assemble a comprehensive list of races I suspect involved levels of Democrat fraud enough to call into question the outcome since 1994.
You should, I would eagerly await it.
It’s hard to be sure of what margin is small enough to question but I don’t trust many if any of the closest rat wins.
I forgot to note that Cox spent Millions of his own $$$$$ on the race, the only point in his favor.
And Newsome still raised MUCH MUCH more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.