Trump is prepping for all-out political war

nypost.com ^ | Michael Goodwin

[FreeReign]

Every detainee at Gitmo who has a lawyer (i.e., every detainee) would have a motion in front of a judge immediately demanding a mistrial. These would have to be granted if the FISA was used for any part of the arrest or conviction, and all subsequent evidence would be “fruit of the poison tree.”

I doubt it.

They would have to prove that the evidence against their clients was obtained illegally.

[Dana1960]

no worries. I knew what you meant :)

[frog in a pot]

I’m not optimistic that enough informed patriots exist to properly effect a lasting cure.

There may be enough to effect a near-term cur but, perhaps, only if Hillary's popular vote was the result of fraud.

[LS]

No-—they would have to be released UNTIL it was proven. They would all be on the streets.

If the presumption in any case is that you were incarcerated based on fraudulent evidence, the “righr” judge will release you immediately.

[LS]

I checked with Robert Barnes on Twitter, who knows his legal stuff. He says that while there would be grounds to open up these cases, courts have recently ignored prosecutorial misconduct.

So, you’re right. And we should all be very, very afraid because of that.

[FreeReign]

No-—they would have to be released UNTIL it was proven. They would all be on the streets. If the presumption in any case is that you were incarcerated based on fraudulent evidence, the “righr” judge will release you immediately.

No. Any person being held is being held partly because a judge has decided that the evidence in the case is credible. It would be up to the defendants lawyer to cast doubt on what has already been determined to be credible evidence based on any new reasonable evidence.

Rogue individuals inside the DOJ and FBI, filing a false FISA warrant application, to go after their political enemies is not new reasonable evidence that casts doubt on the existing evidence in a totally unrelated case. No reasonable judge would release terrorists based on that.

If your only point is that the "right" judge will do the wrong thing and start releasing terrorists, then the DOJ can ignore the rogue judge and appeal the case all the way up to the Supreme Court where they will win.

[FreeReign]

He says that while there would be grounds to open up these cases, courts have recently ignored prosecutorial misconduct.

Yup.

And we should all be very, very afraid because of that.

Yes, be afraid of the Obama judges.

[MarMema]

This poor guy has given up years of his awesome retirement to fight for America.

And taken so much crap from the left.

CW2 will be ok by me.

[LS]

Apparently it’s “all” judges. He says few are willing to address prosecutorial misconduct. Not good.