Skip to comments.
Trump’s latest tweets cross clear lines, experts say: Obstruction of justice and witness tampering
The Washington Compost ^
| December 3 at 7:29 PM
| Deanna Paul
Posted on 12/03/2018 4:56:11 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Maceman
In the engineering world expert is defined as some dude that lives more than 100 miles away.
21
posted on
12/03/2018 5:10:59 PM PST
by
dsrtsage
(For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Deanna Paul - truly gifted in so many ways.
She like long walks on the beach, margaritas and puppies named Max.
22
posted on
12/03/2018 5:11:31 PM PST
by
Eddie01
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trump has lost some ammunition when he lost the House. All hell will break lose with the communists Democrats hitting below the belt is such rapid methods Trump will not be able to breath. He will received dozens of Subpoenas for dozens of hearing the rats will start. Trump is in trouble.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
—— But legal experts are calling Mondays missives a newsworthy development that amounts to evidence of obstructing justice.——
What legal experts ?
24
posted on
12/03/2018 5:12:54 PM PST
by
Popman
("GOD´S NOT LOOKING FOR PARTNERSHIP WITH US, BUT OWNERSHIP OF US")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What is the “reward” for Stone, that the Washington Post claims is implied by Trump’s tweet?
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Does he mean to say that crossing a legal line is illegal, or can be used to hold someone accountable, in Washington D.C.?
I have been thinking about all the verified illegalities that have been committed by the DOJ officials and Intelligence officials and in times past, it would have been enough to put people in prison for a very long time.
Sara Carter and John Solomon can come out with bombshell after bombshell, and they are bombshells; the conservative commentators hit the ceiling on the air, and then drop them.
Republican Congressmen mention them and say they are “disturbing” and then drop them.
26
posted on
12/03/2018 5:13:17 PM PST
by
odawg
To: E. Pluribus Unum
praising a witness for not cooperating with the implication of reward
I must have missed that in Trump's tweet.
27
posted on
12/03/2018 5:13:50 PM PST
by
JoSixChip
(He is Batman!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Rats are crapping their pants about the Damocles' Sword of declassified FISA abuse documents, hanging over their head.
Also, Bush 41's funeral may have postponed the Huber Report release.
All the Rat media can do is try to pre-empt President Trump with crap like this article.
28
posted on
12/03/2018 5:15:28 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(I have already previewed this composition.)
To: Eddie01
Dayum! She can write negative crap about me all she wants!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, it he wasn’t commenting on this weird constitutional bohunkus of a Special Counsel (Prosecutor?) I’d agree.
Don’t want him talking that way anout normal Constitutional justice cases.
“It’s illegal for a Republican President to fight back. “
Yeah, that’s the crux.
30
posted on
12/03/2018 5:16:27 PM PST
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Legal gibberish.
Unless it would be illegal for a defendant’s lawyer to make exactly the same statements about the police and/or the prosecutors involved in his case, Trump has not done or said anything illegal.
31
posted on
12/03/2018 5:17:18 PM PST
by
sourcery
(Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
To: onemiddleamerican
A Twitter post praising someone for refusing to lie is now considered "obstruction of justice?" LMAO.
32
posted on
12/03/2018 5:17:38 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The babbling nabobs of Bull Shit can just STFU.
33
posted on
12/03/2018 5:19:29 PM PST
by
Bullish
(My tagline ran off with another man.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“But legal experts say...(spit)
34
posted on
12/03/2018 5:21:31 PM PST
by
unread
(Joe McCarthy was right.......)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So its now illegal to tweet out disdain for a BOGUS investigation that was created as an excuse as to why the Commie left lost an election they all believed was owed to them..well okie dokie then
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trump used to be a favorite celebrity for liberals, but ever since 2016, he is persona non grata to democrats, and every thing he does is dangerous and illegal, including his ‘illegal’ winning of the presidency. Heck, if democrats decided to investigate Trump’s entire life, everything he did was illegal, including being born.
36
posted on
12/03/2018 5:23:23 PM PST
by
adorno
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The little fascist piggy, Norman Eisen, should worry more about getting arrested for treason.
37
posted on
12/03/2018 5:23:38 PM PST
by
sergeantdave
(Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
To: Popman
But legal experts are calling Mondays missives a newsworthy development that amounts to evidence of obstructing justice. What legal experts ? ===================================
Judge Napalitano on Fox? I think he's batting about 2% these days.
38
posted on
12/03/2018 5:25:31 PM PST
by
Dogbert41
(When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. -Luke 11:21)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
But legal experts are calling Mondays missives a newsworthy development that amounts to evidence of obstructing justice. So it isn't obstructing justice. It "amounts," that is to say, in somebody's opinion it might be tantamount to, not "obstructing justice," but "evidence of obstructing justice."
In plain English, bollocks.
39
posted on
12/03/2018 5:25:49 PM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
To: Logical me
"All hell will break lose with the communists Democrats hitting below the belt is such rapid methods Trump will not be able to breath. He will received dozens of Subpoenas for dozens of hearing the rats will start. Trump is in trouble."
Wrong, wrong, wrong. The leadership of the rats/socialists are already saying to back off the impeachment dreams. Mueller's report will try to massage Flynn's, Manafort's, and Cohen's perjury traps into a vague connection to Trump by association. It will go nowhere other than to give fodder to the whiny cable channels for weeks or months. Mark my words.
40
posted on
12/03/2018 5:26:21 PM PST
by
A Navy Vet
(I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson