What, precisely, do Democrats want to impeach Trump for?

Washington Examiner ^ | Janaury 6, 2019 | Byron York |

[Georgia Girl 2]

For being Trump. What else?

[Black Agnes]

Because he’s a big mean poopyhead.

nyah.

[DownInFlames]

State of the Union speech will be interesting to watch,

[elcid1970]

They hate Trump and the voters who elected him.

They want to impeach Trump and they want to punish his supporters by taking away our guns.

Their object is power, pure power.

[Zionist Conspirator]

For beating them, of course. How dare he!

[Ann Archy]

Don’t think so because ALL of them would have cowered and CAVED to anything they wanted!

[JimRed]

He beat Hillary. That’s a high crime or misdemeanor in their eyes.

[The_Media_never_lie]

For being a MF?

[The_Media_never_lie]

They don’t really want to impeach Trump; they want to talk about it.

[dirtymac]

They want him impeached because he won the election.

The fix was in! Hillary would be crowned Queen of America.

Fake ballots were distributed to where they were needed, votes were rigged (see California).

Somehow he won the prize that was supposed to be theirs. They were entitled.

This needs to be corrected at any cost.

[x]

"What for?" as in "Why?"

Or "What for?" as in what the charges will be?

The reason is that his policies are so different from their own.

What the pretext for impeachment will be changes from week to week and from month to month.

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

John 10:31-32 (NIV):

31 Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, 32 but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?”

[DouglasKC]

Haha the complaints sound like high school girl complaints against the popular kid.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks SMGFan.

• Dershowitz on Impeachment: 'It's Not Going to Work,' Dems Won't 'Ever Remove' Trump
• Dems should give thoughts of impeachment a pass
• Maybe Adam Schiff should investigate his donors before he goes after Trump
• California Rings in the New Year With 1,016 New Laws

[bitt]

p

[matthew fuller]

Conspiracy to Collude, of course.

[Liz]

Recently, Monica Lewinsky made clear that Slick suborned perjury from her, an impeachable offense, for which he also could have lost his law license.

Slick may well have coerced Monica. So where's the femiNazis? They gave Slick a pass when they should have been
up in arms about boorish behavior from an alpha male, serial predator they despise.

Clinton lied about that subornation as well while under oath.
MORE EGREGIOUSLY.....Slick even went so far as to have Lewinsky give Linda Tripp written instructions,
coaching Linda on how to properly perjure herself in the Willey matter. (Linda didnt buy it.)

===============================

THE LIST GOES ON AND ON: Bill's intimate pal, Vernon Jordan, arranged a $40,000-per-year cushy government job for Lewinsky shortly
after she signed ......but before she filed...... a falsified affidavit saying she had NOT had sex with the president.

As insurance, Clinton had another pal, his Ambassador to the United Nations, Bill Richardson,
personally visit Lewinsky at the Watergate to offer her a government job to shut her up.

======================================

AND THIS---Then-First Lady Hillary went hog wild with tax dollars. She set up what she called a "Bimbo Eruption Team" in the West Wing of the White House composed of tax-paid govt workers including then-Clinton aide George Stephanopolous....now at ABC-TV. The tax-paid West Wing office office operated for eight long years.....and did nothing but shoot down, demean, defame and lacerate any woman who dared surface about Bill's sexual activities.

These expenditures of tax dollars saved Bill's presidency, got Hillary elected to the US Senate, and gave Hillary the prominence she needed to launch the rest of her political ambitions.

[Liz]

All of Clinton's sexual misdeeds occurred while he was a sitting President.
(A) 37 WH visits from Lewinsky, (B) the subsequent lies, and, (C) the cover-up.

ITEM---Moreover, the lewinskied Clinton didn’t just lie. He lied under oath......
a transgression serious enough to cost him his law license.

BACKSTORY----THE IMPEACHMENT OF BILL CLINTON

Attorney David Schippers was asked by his friend, Congressman Henry Hyde, to be Chief Investigative Counsel
for the US House Judiciary Committee. Schippers, a lifelong Democrat, accepted and took the job in April 1998.

The Hyde Committee was holding an inquiry on whether Clinton had committed impeachable offences in his handling
of the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit..... during which Clinton committed perjury regarding his affair with
Monica Lewinsky. The committee in December 1998 voted to impeach Clinton........a decision supported by Schippers.

On December 10, 1998, Schippers said to the committee: The President, then,
<><> has lied under oath in a civil deposition,
<><> he lied under oath in a criminal grand jury.
<><> he lied to the people,
<><> he lied to his Cabinet,
<><> he lied to his top aides,
<><> and now he's lied under oath to the Congress of the United States.
There's no one left to lie to."

[Candor7]

What, precisely, do Democrats want to impeach Trump for? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Big Hands ?

[bgill]

For being an outsider who will expose their misdeeds.