If you're referring to the central American Aztec/Mayan pyramids, I would say it has more than just earmarks...
Posted on 01/18/2019 3:43:22 AM PST by Norski
“Soylent red.”
Succinctly put.
“do you honestly think that pelosi, clinton and others of her ilk are not doing this?”
________________________________
Yes. I do believe that they are doing this. I believe that many persons either are doing so or plan to do so at some time in the future, if they have means and opportunity.
A more troubling aspect is that I believe it to be possible people may be doing more than just infusing it into their veins, and that the sources of what they are putting into their bodies may not always be obtained of willing donors.
What could go wrong?
One of the side effects is a craving for Tide Pods.
“Cannibalism. How progressive.”
________________________________
S’truth.
Leviticus 17:11 “For the life of the flesh is in the blood . . .”
“Only be sure that thou eat not the blood: for the blood is the life; and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh.”
This is why digital meat thermometers are so important. 165 degrees for chicken or I don’t eat it. If it oozes blood it is not safe to eat. Possibly the above has to do with food safety?
I only get grade A babies blood from y LICENSED doc in Transylvania.
Back in the late '80's, I was only getting $15 for donating plasma. I know there's been some inflation, but $8,000 is absurd.
I apologise, I do not understand the reference.
Nancy Pelosi is eating Tide Pods?
The Veritas videos are very scary. Does anyone really think those baby body parts are all going to research?
This isn’t going to work out well.
Apparently, a lot.
This question is addressed in the second article I posted regarding this, by Luther, further down the list. I put it into bloggers, as that article came from the Organic Prepper website.
I believe that it has to do with bacteria in the flesh. This is a CDC recommendation.
Best to do one’s own research there, I believe.
It does appear to have some earmarks of a pyramid scheme, does it not?
I actually can help with the answer to this. It has become WELL ESTABLISHED science in the last several years that blood transfusions are incredibly dangerous. There are several landmark studies that clearly demonstrate patients who require blood transfusions have a much higher incidence of cancers and death at one and five years when compared to similar patients who do not receive transitions (Kaplan must regression curve). We used to transfuse anyone with a hemoglobin below 10. As an intensivist now I hardly ever transfuse unless there is life threatening hemorrhage or I can demonstrate that a patient needs oxygen carrying capacity (the purpose of blood transfusion) by way of some sophisticated lab technique I won’t bore you with. The bottom line. Restrictive blood transfusion techniques clearly are better for the patient in terms of long term survival and this is the standard of care. Blood transfusion for the purposes in this article are just snake oil salesmanship and clearly no reputable science would have someone pay them to assist in research.
If you're referring to the central American Aztec/Mayan pyramids, I would say it has more than just earmarks...
Thank you. Your comment brings up several points I had in the back of my mind, and as it appears that you may be an anaethesiologist, may I ask a question or two of you?
Is there now an alternate standard method for oxygen saturation of the blood? I had read some years ago regarding such with animal research, but do not remember the gas used - fluor?
Has it become any sort of common practice for patients to bank their own blood previous to surgery?
I had begun to see an article or two regarding the dangers of transfused blood, but not platelets. Would it be possible to expand on this?
Thank you, Norski
Ah, yes. I have seen this reproduction. Thank you.
I was only referencing the large numbers of persons required to supply the raw material for the infusions versus the small number of persons receiving said blood product.
I see, however, that you have cut straight to the chase.
And this is the end of the horrific process. This is how men both sacrifice to their god, and believe that they will become gods. The spilling of blood is not optional. The question is that of whose blood is spilled.
It's a superstition adhered to by most primitive peoples. They see the result of blood loss on the body and logically (though wrongly, of course) conclude that life itself is contained in the blood. It's one of the reasons why there are so many taboos, paralleled in cultures continents apart, concerning menstruation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.