Posted on 02/19/2019 11:15:09 PM PST by knighthawk
Yes, I saw that and ‘squirm’ is the exact thing I said when I saw it. He’s so obviously lying.
“Thats like saying I feel - it means nothing to another person and certainly nothing to a court.”
Ahhh but you see that’s where the Mueller clean-up crew comes in! They keep such outrageous accusations out of court by nailing a bunch of little fish on process crimes. Keeps the smoke pots going so that the uniformed think that there’s a “real fire” somewhere.
The FBI has been poisoned since Ruby Ridge & Waco. To this day the agency has too many knee-jerk defenders among both sides of the political class.
When was an amendment last repealed?
And “it’s possible” that I’m Princess Anastasia.
ridiculous
“This clown boasted on television to America about his role in seditious conspiracy, an offense that carries hefty fines and decades in prison per count.”
Has Bill Barr caught on?
Does he care?
Will he take action?
Trust the Plan, part II (urp)
CNN’s Toobin says its Patriotic for DOJ Officials to Discuss Removing Trump Via 25th Amendment
Newsbusters ^ | February 19, 2019 | P.J. Gladnick / FR Posted by PJ-Comix
Jeffrey Toobin is CNN’s chief legal analyst, but he seems to be clueless about the fact that the 25th Amendment can only be invoked when a president is either physically or mentally incapacitated. It was never intended to be used in case high level officials decided that they just didn’t like a president.
Yet somehow Toobin allowed his obvious dislike for President Donald Trump to, well, trump any basic legal sense on his part on Monday’s The Situation Room to declare that it was “patriotic” for FBI and DOJ officials to discuss Trump’s removal from office via the 25th Amendment even though to do so would have been plainly unconstitutional. (Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Notably there is NO mention of the 2 hops rule for FISA warrants.
The FISA wasnt just to spy on Trumps campaign via Carter Page.......but with the 2 hops rule the Obama spies could spy on virtually the entire Trump campaign staff.
SOURCE-REDDIT.COM Under FISA law, when the government obtains a warrant on an individual, they are also allowed to spy on anyone that person contacts, as well as anyone the contacted person contacts, as well as anyone that person contacted, going back FIVE YEARS!
IOW, the Obama admin got a FISA warrant on Carter Page, but since Page would have been in contact with at least 1 member of the Trump campaign, and that member or one of their contacts probably was in contact with virtually anyone even remotely connected to the campaign........the FISA warrant made it legal for Obama and his cronies to spy on anyone even remotely connected to Trump or the campaign and look at ANY of their communications over the last FIVE YEARS!
This should be a major focus of news stories......
Right now one of the misleading talking points from the Deep State is that this FISA was innocently looking at Page only.
Two important products of Congressional investigations:
<><>the 18 Jan 2017 memo declassified by Pres Trump,
<><> the 28 Dec 2018 letter to Sen Mitch McConnell,
The key facts revealed:
<><> (1) the Obama FBI used, as factual basis for FISA apps, bogus info from the Steele dossier, a compilation of anti-Trump info that the FBI had not verified.
<><> (2) Obama's corrupt FBI nevertheless swore to the truth of that info to obtain surveillance warrants on Carter Page, Trump's one-time campaign advisor; <><> (3) in the process of obtaining the search warrants the Obama FBI failed to inform FISA that the Steele dossier was bought and paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
Obama hand-in-hand with his pal, NSA's Susan Rice.... outrageously asked for and obtained hundreds of unmaskings, of US citizens. Their communications were intercepted by the Obama FBI and NSA as part of so-called intel operations. Innocent Americans were unmasked, and were used against Trump in the campaign.
<><> Why did the unmaskings even occur, and what information was illegally shared by Rice with Obama and/or Hillary?
<><>What illegal direction did the FBI, the NSA, and other intel agencies take to monitor Trump-related communications?
Predictably, Democraps have stopped the investigations cold. The most heinous aspect of this Democrap outrage is that the Obama admin and his factotums ----like Third World tinpot warlords----calculatedly picked over the intel apparat, set-up to protect the safety and security of Americans, to advance their scurrilous political schemes.
Partners in crime.......the two we should be investigating.
There have been no mainstream reports at all on the left’s and the demokrap party’s very cozy relationship with communist Russia stretching back nearly a century. I would guess more than half the people who live within the borders of the USA have no idea of the left’s activities with communism.
McCabe has no choice to stick to the lie that Trump is a Russian asset. This is in line with why the Obozo-Clinton nexus illegally spied on his campaign and tried to take him down before and after the election. The media is all too ready to participate as they are fellow travelers, and like communists do, keep telling the lie so that it seems like truth to the masses.
Putin has no interests in fighting the globalists. He uses them when convenient. For example, signed big oil contracts with Shell Oil years ago to develop very remote energy fields, then when the work is done, cancels the contract, kicks them out. Putin/Russia without the nuclear bomb and some minerals sitting next to Europe, and veto power at the toothless UN . . . would be insignificant. My recall of Trump’s comment during the campaign were to engage Russia to see if there were common interests (fighting terrorists) so as to avoid war with each other.
It's much more likely that McCabe is psychotic, stupid or both stupid and psychotic.
It is possible, even likely, that McCabe is a space alien and his wife is a witch that has caused global warming.
agreed. but i’m thinking of “normal” people, not brainwashed ones ... hopefully there’s enough normals remaining ...
“And thinks that’s why we started our investigation.”
And thinks???!!!
You mean he doesn’t really know why he started the investigation?
Is that just pathetic writing or did he actually phrase the thought that way?
“Is that just pathetic writing or did he actually phrase the thought that way?”
I saw the interview. He said it that way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.