Posted on 04/03/2019 12:46:43 PM PDT by onyx
Does any sane person believe that, after Mueller and his hand-picked team of Democrat hit men couldn’t manufacture or find evidence of collusion, Jabba the hut is going to prove collusion? When moderates and independents figure that out, President Trump will win 2020 in a landslide (no matter how many vote harvested illegals vote in California).
MUELLER’S REPORT IN THE HANDS OF PIRANHAS PELOSI, SCHIFF AND NADLER IMPERILS OUR SAFETY AND SECURITY
AMERICANS DEMAND ASSURANCES THEIR SAFETY AND SECURITY IS PROTECTED
NO DEMOCRAT SEES THE MUELLER REPORT UNTIL THESE CONDITIONS ARE MET:
<><> handover all communications from Obama WRT the Trump campaign;
<><> the public release of any and all communication about the decision not to indict Hillary Clinton.
<><> the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the particulars into Hillary Clinton’s email use;
<><> the release of all Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications related to Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
<><> release of all opposition research the pee dossier compiled against candidate Trump;
<><> list the number of spies sent into the Trump campaign;
<><> a compilation of false accusations made against the Trump campaign;
<><> the release of all communications regarding the Obama apparat’s decision to promote fake allegations against the president;
<><> detailed legal assessment into whether there was misuse of elected office;
<><> a complete list of all the actors who constructed the Russian-collusion fairy tale;
<><> testimony under oath of Obama-era CIA Director John Brennan;
<><> testimony under oath of Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.
US CONGRESS SWITCHBOARD: (202) 224-3121
CONTACT PAGE-—REP DEVIN NUNES
https://nunes.house.gov/contactform/
First of all there is precedent; if Dems can demand and get grand jury testimony even if relevant and irrelevant to the main subject, then they can and will get their hands on future grand jury testimonies. Second of all, there are meandering things asked by Prosecutors and things said by people being asked (like rumors) that can be used (twisted) against Trump in the name of revelation.
You should ask a mod to delete this false post.
Under the Special Prosecutor law, (which congress allowed to expire), Ken Starr was required to present his report, (the whole report), to congress. The Dems, Nadler et. al., were incensed that the full report was given to congress and the house voted to release it all to the public.
Don’t worry, I’ll have it to you in 625 days.
Did the report contain Grand Jury information or justifiably Classified information.
You can believe in the tooth fairy and get better results.
Oh, unless you are a protected race and class then the justice department will take care of you.
I don’t think so,but I have not researched that part.
I can picture Barr responding with going after those trying to use the legal system to commit illegals acts....especially if they really push him hard....he showed utter disdain for them during the confirmation bloviation show.
Start was empaneled under a different statute.
But honesty and intellect have never been your strong points, have they?
Starr. Dann you autocorrect.
400 Lawyers plus staffers in Congress. Once they start parsing, the phrase, “President Trump is completely innocent of any crime.” will mean the opposite in the papers and on TV.
This is just a Dem stunt. By law the AG has no responsibility to release any of the report to the public. He can release a 4 page summary and call it a day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.