Nadler Gives Bill Barr 9 AM Monday Deadline to Comply With “Counter Offer” Before Holding AG in Contempt of Congress
1 posted on
05/03/2019 6:35:09 PM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: bitt
Wasn’t Holder charged with contempt of congress?
Yawn.
I have contempt for congress.
85 posted on
05/04/2019 3:47:20 AM PDT by
Baldwin77
(They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
To: bitt
I’m sure Barr is quaking in his boots...just like Holder.
To: bitt
Hey Bill, tell Jerry to go pound sand.
88 posted on
05/04/2019 5:37:30 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
( Molon Labe' baby, Molon Labe)
To: bitt
Nadler and company want Barr to do the only reasonable thing and not agree to their illegal demands - that way they can howl that he obviously has something to hide and has gone “rogue”...
More egg on their faces before this is over...
91 posted on
05/04/2019 8:41:53 AM PDT by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
To: bitt
Okay. So AG Barr will laugh it off just like AG Eric Holder did. In this case, it’s a righteous laugh.
92 posted on
05/04/2019 8:57:02 AM PDT by
A Navy Vet
(I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
To: bitt
So Nadler will be holding Barr in contempt for NOT breaking the law at Badler's "order".
Nadler wants Barr held in contempt for not being able to see pieces of the report that is readily available to Nadler, yet Nadler refuses to review those pieces.
Nadler wants Grand Jury data he is not entitled to see, and is demanding that Barr break the law to reveal that data to Nadler.
So, is Nadler suborning Barr to break the law, and isn't THAT the real crime here?
93 posted on
05/04/2019 9:13:05 AM PDT by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
