Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem wants Trump officials jailed for not turning over tax returns
Fox News.com ^ | May 22, 2019 | Brooke Singman

Posted on 05/22/2019 7:47:07 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: PLOM...NOT!

So do we all.


41 posted on 05/22/2019 1:54:15 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

What lies and what lawlessness? Makes me think that if they manage to get the documents they want that they are going to add something to them to make President Trump guilty, fake them up like O’s birth certificate.

They are really pushing this by lying themselves.


42 posted on 05/22/2019 11:03:11 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego; Kaslin

>
I don’t get this.

Isn’t it a fact, that our IRS filing, including those of any elected official, are confidential? Isn’t it a fact, that such tax information can only be released under certain limited circumstances?

Isn’t it a fact that you can’t just call up the IRS and ask for copies of someone’s tax returns? Isn’t it a fact that we have laws regulating release of tax information, which Democrats apparently want to violate?
>

Ha! You seem to think the Left would give 2* sh!ts re: “the Law”...let alone the tyrants in black-robes whom would back ‘em up [and when they do, ZERO from the (R)N(C) to impeach\disbar\remove])


43 posted on 05/23/2019 5:11:58 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet; willyd

>
Any congressional exemptions from legislation must approved in separate legislation with a mandatory roll call vote.
>

I fail to note where ANY ‘exemption’ to *any* govt employee, outside of that specifically listed in the Constitution, passes the “smell test”, if not smacks directly as antithesis to the Constitution (Equal of/under the Law. Nation of Laws, not of Men).


44 posted on 05/23/2019 5:21:48 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

>Sexual harassment slush fund records. Why can’t we see those?

Why not ask the (R)N(C) ‘leadership’? That was one of the FASTEST ‘under the rugs’ I’ve seem in ages.

Oh, I know, we only need to elect a few more “conservatives”...THEN watch the ‘magic’ *spit* *SMH*


45 posted on 05/23/2019 5:24:28 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Maskot

>
So laws are now whatever Dems “deem” them to be? What statue says jail time is required for not doing what they want?
>

Why not? When you have the black-robed tyrants giving their approving ‘decrees’ to the lawlessness...and ZERO push back from the “small govt” (R)N(C).

Don’t know ‘bout you, but I haven’t seen/heard/read hide nor hair from, the supposed, ‘our side’ of the political isle. Silence is consent, no? (Yet, PLENTY here will continue to pull the SAME (R) lever for the SAME spineless\B. Arnold names...)


46 posted on 05/23/2019 5:29:02 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Exemptions should not be allowed. If needed, though, they should require a national plescite.


47 posted on 05/26/2019 6:24:58 AM PDT by MortMan (Americans are a people increasingly separated by our connectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MortMan; CommerceComet

Plebescite. Fat fingers!


48 posted on 05/26/2019 6:39:17 AM PDT by MortMan (Americans are a people increasingly separated by our connectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Exemptions should not be allowed. If needed, though, they should require a national plescite.

There may be legitimate reasons to exempt Congress from legislation just like exemptions are allowed for other organizations. The problem is Congress taking advantage of the exemption for the personal benefit of the Congressmen and to the detriment of the citizens of the U.S. Congress has forgotten that the interests of their members and those of the citizens often diverge and seldom are in alignment. I'm inclined to just force complete disclosure first. No more middle-of-the-night, voice votes to hide their devious actions. If complete disclosure doesn't work, then some national plebiscite is in order.

49 posted on 05/26/2019 6:47:29 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Trusting congress to disclose is folly to me. Legitimate exemptions may occasionally be needed, but less restrictions on society where congress can’t bother being under the same rules is even more attractive.


50 posted on 05/26/2019 7:09:01 AM PDT by MortMan (Americans are a people increasingly separated by our connectivity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson