Posted on 07/14/2019 8:25:38 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
He is vouching for Steele and has not stepped back from that original statement so it appears that he is endorsing the veracity of the Steele document.
I doubt that he didn’t know that it was manufactured to hurt POTUS.
Perhaps you could have posted the meaning of “perfidious albion” and EVERYONE could benefit
The more of this guy's "analysis" I read, the less I think he's worth as a diplomat. Of all of the things an ambassador should be aware, surely a diplomatic agreement of this magnitude involving his own country as well ought to be treated more seriously than dismissed as a fit of pique. That just isn't very professional.
Sir Kim and Christopher Steele haven't done their country any good with this ridiculous charade, rather the opposite. Why Trump would not question the most fundamental intelligence arrangements within the Five Eyes circle is quite beyond imagination. That is a far weightier issue than petty political revenge.
BTTT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.