Skip to comments.
Judge Upholds David Daleiden’s 1st Amendment Right to Expose Planned Parenthood Aborted Baby...
LIFE NEWS ^
| July 18, 2019
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 07/19/2019 2:30:22 AM PDT by Morgana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
YES...MORE WINNING
1
posted on
07/19/2019 2:30:22 AM PDT
by
Morgana
To: Morgana
i guess he’s not so “under cover” anymore
2
posted on
07/19/2019 2:31:52 AM PDT
by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
To: Morgana
NOT tired of WINNING yet!
Keep it coming. The misery, fright(?)
we see on a number of faces is a first for most of US.
3
posted on
07/19/2019 3:01:35 AM PDT
by
V K Lee
("VICTORY FOR THE RIGHTEOUS IS JUDGMENT FOR THE WICKED")
To: Morgana
4
posted on
07/19/2019 4:36:03 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(AOC: The brain of a tea bisquit)
To: Morgana
I’m trying to understand why they should get any “damages”
5
posted on
07/19/2019 4:42:27 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: COBOL2Java
Nice. I tried to impress this upon my son.
It pretty much boiled down to: “It’s okay to fail. Every one does. Learn from failure. What’s not okay is quitting.”
L
6
posted on
07/19/2019 4:47:22 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: Morgana
Is this then guy Kamala Harris investigated instead of investigating the baby parts sellers.
7
posted on
07/19/2019 4:50:38 AM PDT
by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: from occupied ga
>I’m trying to understand why they should get any “damages”
I ask the same question, but I ‘misspell’ mine “taxpayer $$”
8
posted on
07/19/2019 5:43:51 AM PDT
by
i_robot73
(One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
To: Morgana
Kamala Harris is responsible for tying up this case and videos in court for years.
I wonder how much $$$ PP has contributed to her campaigns?
9
posted on
07/19/2019 7:12:18 AM PDT
by
victim soul
(victim soul)
To: Morgana
Judge Orrick previously faced scrutiny presiding over the case because of his history founding, promoting, and donating to a Planned Parenthood clinic in San Francisco run by Plaintiff Planned Parenthood Northern California. That he would rule so strongly against Planned Parenthood speaks volumes.
With San Fran being such a gay and happy life, why do they need abortionariums there?
10
posted on
07/19/2019 7:17:40 AM PDT
by
ro_dreaming
(Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
To: Morgana
Kind of scary you have to go to court to tell the truth about abortion.
11
posted on
07/19/2019 7:22:52 AM PDT
by
lerker
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Judge William Orrick III rejected Planned Parenthood’s false and long-running smear that accused CMP citizen journalists, including David Daleiden, of attempting to incite “threats” and “violence” by publishing the undercover videos.
12
posted on
07/19/2019 8:09:17 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: Morgana
To: lerker; SkyPilot; Roman_War_Criminal; null and void
[Kind of scary you have to go to court to tell the truth about abortion.]
The hour is late and the day is long past.
This kind of horror is the Democrat gold standard of “women’s health”.
A euphemism for systematic slaughter.
14
posted on
07/19/2019 8:44:01 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: ro_dreaming
[With San Fran being such a gay and happy life, why do they need abortionariums there?]
San Fran Nan said SanFagSicko “is the best example of living the Gospel”.
And then someone here said “Nancy, you’ll be naked in Heaven” (don’t know if it was the same thread).
This was many years ago. I just shook my head.
15
posted on
07/19/2019 8:45:51 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: All
A US judge was able to figure this out? Amazing.
16
posted on
07/19/2019 9:06:35 AM PDT
by
veracious
(UN=OIC=Islam ; USAgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
To: victim soul
This is a democrat tactic. Get a liberal judge to rule incorrectly, blatantly so, to tie someone up in court costs of appeals. They know they won’t win but they will cost someone money. Even is the target wins getting them to pay court costs gets tied up in endless appeals.
To: SaveFerris
And then someone here said “Nancy, you’ll be naked in Heaven” (don’t know if it was the same thread). I don't think it would be Heaven if we had to look at a naked Pelosi.
18
posted on
07/19/2019 11:07:42 AM PDT
by
null and void
(The Democratic Party is back to loving workers but hating employers. A winning formula IÂ’m sure.)
To: null and void
19
posted on
07/19/2019 11:16:14 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: morphing libertarian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
