Posted on 08/23/2019 12:16:36 PM PDT by mplc51
Good post!!!
I’ll bet even the atheists in the dem party are praying for Ruth buzzy.
I don’t know about her specific condition, but pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest types of cancer. Almost impossible to treat because if is so deep within the body.
Most die within 6 months of diagnosis.
Let alone for an 86 year old.
Normally, in a case like that they wouldn’t even treat the person. Just let her die in peace.
I hope a few million democrats decide to donate their own pancreas.
I want to die in my sleep like my Grandfather did and not screaming in terror like the passengers in his car.
—
LOL :-)
She’ll die on the bench. Democrats will use her health to whip their base to a frenzy and get them out to vote next year so Biden can replace her.
She may only have a few months to live..cancer at that age the second round old people make it about six months..she has had a good life..most people never make her age..
Thank you!
And she could have two or three years left in her. We don't know. Regardless she'll remain on the bench so long as she has breath in her.
My friend was gone within three weeks of diagnosis. And it was PAINFUL
Cheers, Ruthless! May you feel every bit of pain in death that youve bestowed upon the unborn over your lifetime.
I have less than zero sympathy
She has had colon and lung cancer and yet she lives on!
I hope Justice Ginsburg is cancer free and does not have to return to Memorial Slone Kettering for further cancer treatments.
As for Democrats hoping for a miracle, that is a pretty negative position. The Democrats disavowed God at their 2016 convention so they don’t believe in the power of prayer.
The chinese are planning to clone your cat. Watch the left clone RGB and then claim the younger is now on scotus.
Satan does miracles, too. Fake miracles, but the leftards won't know the difference.
Funny!!
She has already survived it once.
86, underwent three weeks of radiation treatment
Wasn’t Obamacare supposed to put a stop to wasteful spending for end of life medical treatments??
Who gave the judicial nod and thus encouraged the slaughter of millions of babies. She will soon go to Hell.
The hypocrisy would be that Bill Clinton was under investigation for Whitewater when he nominated Ginsburg.
To argue now that Trump can't nominate Ginsburg's replacement under the same conditions that she was nominated in the first place won't argue well.
The only arguable difference might be if the House actually impeaches and the Senate is "distracted" by the trial. On the one hand, the Senate won't want it during election season as one-third of them can't focus on campaigning for reelection with impeachment votes hanging over them. On the other hand is the nomination left hanging.
Nothing about impeachment stops the President from naming a nomination. It falls on the Senate to act, or not. If Trump names a strong conservative Catholic woman like Amy Coney Barrett and McConnell and Graham let it languish because of the rank political ploy in the House, they will be condemned forever by conservatives.
-PJ
Excellent point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.