Skip to comments.
India plans to attack POK, we’ll fight till end: Imran Khan
Times Of India ^
| 08/15/2019
| Omer Farooq Khan
Posted on 08/31/2019 11:22:02 PM PDT by libh8er
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
08/31/2019 11:22:02 PM PDT
by
libh8er
To: libh8er
India vs. Pakistan: Whats the betting line on which side throws the first nuke?
2
posted on
08/31/2019 11:28:43 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: reg45
I’m under the impression that India is the more powerful army, so I’d be betting on Pakistan using nukes.
3
posted on
08/31/2019 11:58:41 PM PDT
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
To: libh8er
Sounds like Pakistan is “justifying” a first strike.
4
posted on
09/01/2019 12:17:18 AM PDT
by
Lee Enfield
(We win, they whine. Keep up the good work.)
To: reg45
[India vs. Pakistan: Whats the betting line on which side throws the first nuke?]
Neither. No nuclear power will use nukes against an adversary with a nuclear counter-strike capability. There’s no percentage in losing tens of millions of people, in a nuclear exchange, over a war where you might lose perhaps tens or hundreds of thousands of troops, at worst. Life is not a Hollywood movie.
I know Pershings were deployed. Do I believe they would have been launched, if the Warsaw Pact had come through the Fulda Gap? No. But if the Soviets had detonated nukes against US forces, there would have been an all-out nuclear exchange. And that is precisely why the Soviets would have held back.
5
posted on
09/01/2019 12:43:34 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: libh8er
To Pakistan, the RSS clearing out the muslims is horrible; the muslims clearing out the Hindus is just fine.
6
posted on
09/01/2019 12:46:01 AM PDT
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: libh8er
The idiot Bush could have taken the Paki nukes after 9/11, instead of kissing Musharraf’s butt. Damn how he misplayed that whole situation SO badly.
7
posted on
09/01/2019 1:07:51 AM PDT
by
montag813
To: montag813
He didn’t misplay anything.
He was an enemy of the state that was in bed with the sauds so much i’m surprised they didn’t knock him up.
8
posted on
09/01/2019 1:33:22 AM PDT
by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: dp0622
True story
The question never asked is why Dubya played rope a dope during and after his presidency
9
posted on
09/01/2019 1:38:02 AM PDT
by
advertising guy
(When Pelosi said " Embrace the suck" Kamala did ...... Willie Brown)
To: libh8er
Who the hell cares? Let them kill each other.
10
posted on
09/01/2019 1:46:01 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: wastedyears
Agreed.
Only problem is the radioactive fallout circling the globe afterwards.
11
posted on
09/01/2019 2:10:48 AM PDT
by
gdzla
(Tyrannis Seditio, Obsequium Deo)
To: reg45
To: Zhang Fei
I believe Pakistan has the crazies enough to use nukes if they think they might lose in any real war against their counterparts.
Remember, in Islam you are a great warrior and go to their heaven in death fighting for their cause.
13
posted on
09/01/2019 3:56:02 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
( Molon Labe' baby, Molon Labe)
To: Joe Boucher
[I believe Pakistan has the crazies enough to use nukes if they think they might lose in any real war against their counterparts.
Remember, in Islam you are a great warrior and go to their heaven in death fighting for their cause.]
I’ve yet to hear of a Muslim leader who was actually willing to risk his own neck. The idea is to risk someone else’s - lower down the totem pole. It doesn’t pencil out for Pakistan. The end of a nuclear war between the two countries will involve the physical extermination of the weaker country. That weaker icountry is not India.
14
posted on
09/01/2019 4:12:42 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: libh8er
India has major issues in initiating any conflict with a muslum state. The muslum population in India itself is heavily integrated over hundreds of years. That is throughout the country, where they have an extensive history in several major cities.
Are they loyal to the country or their faith? Pfff...
15
posted on
09/01/2019 4:16:52 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Zhang Fei
Horse sht. Fodder for western idiots. In Russia anyone fearing nuclear war in the ranks is sacked. And muslims do not care. They are the most likely group to use them over a soccer game dispute. They have murdered each other in millions for less.
16
posted on
09/01/2019 4:22:43 AM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: Joe Boucher
A nuclear war between the two countries, in which tens of millions are killed, will unleash uncontrollable passions. At the end of such a war, there might not be any Muslims left on the subcontinent. The partition in 1947 left a million dead and that was just sectarian violence without much proximate cause apart from wild rumors. With tens of millions dead, the cry for revenge will be irresistible until the job is complete. At the end of it all, Pakistan will be a Muslim-free Indian state. And that’s why Pakistan will shrink from using nukes. Not worth the consequences.
17
posted on
09/01/2019 4:31:26 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: JudgemAll
[Horse sht. Fodder for western idiots. In Russia anyone fearing nuclear war in the ranks is sacked. And muslims do not care. They are the most likely group to use them over a soccer game dispute. They have murdered each other in millions for less.]
And yet the Russians backed down when the Warsaw Pact collapsed instead of activating the Samson option and bringing the temple down on East and West alike. The issue isn’t that the people lower down will disobey their orders, although this might happen. It’s that leaders will decide that tens of millions of friendly dead and the extermination of every single man, woman and child in his country by the victorious power (not Pakistan) is not worth the satisfaction of seeing tens of millions of Indians killed.
18
posted on
09/01/2019 4:39:50 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: Zhang Fei
"Life is not a Hollywood movie." Try selling that line to today's youth... They'll spit in your face and hit you with their selfie stick...
19
posted on
09/01/2019 4:42:43 AM PDT
by
unread
(Joe McCarthy was right.......)
To: Zhang Fei
Oh, those peace-loving , fun-loving moozlums. What an incredibly screwed - up uncivil “culture “.
20
posted on
09/01/2019 4:45:49 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson