Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP FACT CHECK: Trump minimizes IS risk, distorts Iran payout
The Associated Press ^ | January 8, 2020 | by Hope Yen (D-AP)

Posted on 01/08/2020 1:44:03 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: cpt jack 1
“Fact checking” would involve presenting facts. They are just saying “no it isn’t” to everything.

Click the link. They present more "facts" to back up their claims.

21 posted on 01/08/2020 2:04:45 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I noticed that the writer makes claims without providing any evidence.


22 posted on 01/08/2020 2:05:19 PM PST by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Two ways the media repackages the same old bias and lies it tells:

1) Slap the words “fact” and “check” in front of any assertion. Really, it’s the same assertion they would make any way but with “fact check” slapped in front of it, you just know someone has really looked into this!!! What the AP and the others don’t tell you? The “someone” is their newsroom quoting the same ole anonymous sources.

Fact check: the moon is made of cheese!!!

2) “Debunked” as a tool for establishing new facts. This comprises assembling a panel of like minded “experts” who all deal with an inconvenient fact by agreeing with each other that said fact has been disproven or isn’t so. Thereafter, since they have all agreed with themselves said inconvenient fact is said to be “debunked.”

“Trump clinging to the debunked theory that his campaign was spied on.”


23 posted on 01/08/2020 2:06:32 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Wow they really backed up their one sentence denials.

I know. They may as well have responded: "Nuh Uh"
24 posted on 01/08/2020 2:06:45 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

<< THE FACTS: There was no $150 billion payout from the U.S. treasury or other countries >>

Pathetic straw man by the AP. Trump never said the 150B came out of the U.S. Treasury.

Note how they didn’t even attempt to fact check Obama’s 1.8 bil CASH payout to the mullahs. You know, the one that arrived in pallets. The one where Obama bypassed Congress because he knew they’d never approve it. The one for which Obama should’ve been impeached.


25 posted on 01/08/2020 2:10:55 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The $1.8 billion is a separate matter. A payout of roughly that amount did come from the U.S. treasury. It was to pay an old IOU.

In the 1970s, Iran paid the U.S. $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered because the government was overthrown and diplomatic relations ruptured. After the nuclear deal, the U.S. and Iran announced they had settled the matter, with the U.S. agreeing to pay the $400 million principal along with about $1.3 billion in interest.

The $400 million was paid in cash and flown to Tehran on a cargo plane, which gave rise to Trump’s previous dramatic accounts of money stuffed in barrels or boxes and delivered in the dead of night. The arrangement provided for the interest to be paid later, not crammed into containers.


Oh...guess that was all ok then.
26 posted on 01/08/2020 2:11:39 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Note how they didn’t even attempt to fact check Obama’s 1.8 bil CASH payout to the mullahs. You know, the one that arrived in pallets

He did....poorly imho. See my post #26 where I quoted him. I never did know all the details of Obama's cash payout. This attempt to explain it away, makes it sound even worse.
27 posted on 01/08/2020 2:13:18 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

Thanks.


28 posted on 01/08/2020 2:14:22 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: madison10
AND he did it in secret. No debate. No approval from Congress. He just did it and we found out about it later.

Nancy Pelosi was livid...

29 posted on 01/08/2020 2:15:23 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: madison10
AND he did it in secret. No debate. No approval from Congress. He just did it and we found out about it later.

Nancy Pelosi was livid...

30 posted on 01/08/2020 2:15:24 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: madison10
AND he did it in secret. No debate. No approval from Congress. He just did it and we found out about it later.

Nancy Pelosi was livid...

31 posted on 01/08/2020 2:15:24 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

You know, my sarcasm loses something in triplicate...


32 posted on 01/08/2020 2:16:05 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Democrat media fact-checking. Laughable!


33 posted on 01/08/2020 2:16:39 PM PST by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

THE FACTS: Because we don’t wanna believe it.

THE FACTS: Because it doesn’t fit our narrative.

Bwahahahaha….


34 posted on 01/08/2020 2:23:54 PM PST by Obadiah (Kill the deep state or lose the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpt jack 1
Man: Oh, this is futile!
Mr. Vibrating: No it isn't.
Man: I came here for a good argument.
Mr. Vibrating: No you didn't; no, you came here for an argument.
Man: An argument isn't just contradiction.
Mr. Vibrating: It can be.
Man: No it can't. An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition.
Mr. Vibrating: No it isn't.
Man: Yes it is! It's not just contradiction.
Mr. Vibrating: Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.
Man: Yes, but that's not just saying 'No it isn't.'
Mr. Vibrating: Yes it is!
Man: No it isn't!
Man: Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of any statement the other person makes.
(short pause)
Mr. Vibrating: No it isn't.

I KNEW I'd read this AP report before...

35 posted on 01/08/2020 2:28:30 PM PST by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cpt jack 1

(Palin)Oh,wellthis is futile!

(Cleese)No itisn't.

(Palin)I came here for a good argument.

(Cleese)No you didn't; no, you came here for an argument.,P.(Palin)An argument’s not the same ascontradiction.

(Cleese)It can be.

(Palin)No it can't!An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a definite proposition.

(Cleese)No it isn't.

(Palin)Yes it is! It isn’t justcontradiction.

(Cleese)Look, if I argue with you, I must take up a contrary position.

(Palin)It isn’tjust saying, “No it isn't.”

(Cleese)Yes it is.

(Palin)No it isn't![laugh track –short pause]Argument’s an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.

(Cleese)No it isn't.

(Palin)It is.

36 posted on 01/08/2020 2:34:47 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

GMTA


37 posted on 01/08/2020 2:35:25 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

It is moronic, simplistic, idiotic.


38 posted on 01/08/2020 2:37:27 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

Well, anyway, that’s the “debt” Ben Rhodes dug up to justify a payoff. No other US president would have even considered that we owed that after the Iranian hostage crisis and everything else that has happened since.


39 posted on 01/08/2020 2:43:06 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Fact checker nitpicking. Trump didn’t need to present a detailed document trail from stealth gift to missles purchase. The transfer of such a large amount gave Iran enough to buy whatever weapons it needed.


40 posted on 01/08/2020 2:48:01 PM PST by Socon-Econ (adical Islam,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson