New Scalia Rising? Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch warns judicial activists he's coming for them

American Thinker ^ | 01/28/2020 | Monica Showalter

[NFHale]

Re Fishing Lodge:

Yeah, that whole affair still stinks like hell.

They got away with murder. Again.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: it would be sweet, sweet revenge for Podesta’s murder of Scalia

You have good evidence for this?

[thoughtomator]

that would be the discussion of “wetworks” directly referring to the time and place of Scalia’s passing, as exposed in Podesta’s emails

[lurk]

Good that the Supremes see the problem, but Congress is the one who should be deciding judicial scope.

[cnsmom]

The Democrats want to end all Christian religion especially any association with education.

[TexasGurl24]

Absolutely laughable.

[magna carta]

man there were some things about him that had me thinking here’s a lib-—boy was I wrong!
GREAT DAY!!

[zeugma]

Does anyone have the case name that is being discussed? Sometimes it’s hard to find stuff at the SC site, without the name. I really wish news articles would at least mention that critical information that is relevant to the story.

[PROCON]

He should of glared at the 4 Supreme Court Justices who disagreed.

[PROCON]

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v. NEW YORK, ET AL

[zeugma]

For those of you who might be interested in reading this missive by Gorsuch, you can find it here. The case is Department of Homeland Security v. New York, and can be found at the Supreme Court's Opinions related to orders page.

[zeugma]

Thanks! Now, if we could only train reporters to actually do their jobs and report the relevant facts... I know not gonna happen...

[MeganC]

The President could easily shut down judicial activism by ignoring any such judicial orders that are beyond the scope of the cases presented to their courts.

Tell them to send it to the USSC if they want it applied nationwide.

[unread]

Hmmm.. Seems I recently read something about storm clouds, thunder and wind but no rain...

[SgtHooper]

Bingo!!

[TheConservativeTejano]

Is the era of Big Judicial Activism over? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not until John Roberts is replaced as Chief Justice.

Partner, u ain't lying.

Chief Justice Roberts is a "Piece of Work".

[Bishop_Malachi]

“....but Congress is the one who should be deciding judicial scope.”’

_______________________________________________

Good luck getting them to step up and do that.

[Bonemaker]

Roberts and Kavanaugh dicey.

[Svartalfiar]

This really should be a simple thing. A judge can only do anything within his area of responsibility. If he really feels the injunction should be more, he has a direct line to a superior court, who can make an immediate emergency ruling on a wider injunction. And if they feel it should be wider/nationwide, they can make an immediate emergency appeal to district/Supremes for that.

And if any judges start abusing this, then the higher courts will probably just start auto-declining all of their attempts.

[Lurkinanloomin]

That’s my estimation.