Skip to comments.
Daredevil and Flat Earth theorist "Mad" Mike Hughes dies in rocket crash
CBS News ^
| 2/21/20
Posted on 02/23/2020 10:50:15 AM PST by Impala64ssa
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-183 next last
To: philman_36
How is it that when you use a pair of binoculars, a zoom camera or a telescope as you see an object "go over the curve" with your naked eye it suddenly comes back into view with the aid of such devices? Not true. Let's go back to 300 years ago, 1720. Back then, illiterate mariners knew that when you perceived an object on the horizon, you could first make out the topgallant masts and sails, but not the deck of a ship. Using a telescope would make the image larger, but you still couldn't see the deck. By climbing up to the crow's nest, you might be able to make out the topmast and sails, but still not the deck. Once again, a telescope would enlarge the image, but was unable to see beyond the horizon. Your statement takes human understanding back to at least to the Bronze Age when Greek and Phoenicians mariners knew this even though that they did not have telescopes. A perfect demostration of idiocracy in action.
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
I should mention that Columbus’ generational ships were tall ships, and could see other tall ships approaching—topgallant and sky sails first.
142
posted on
02/24/2020 12:40:46 PM PST
by
Does so
(...Democrats believe in democracy only when they win the election...)
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
143
posted on
02/24/2020 12:43:00 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: centurion316
Using a telescope would make the image larger, but you still couldn't see the deck.Snicker...perhaps you meant to say the telescope brought the object into closer view. I don't know of any telescope that makes an object "larger".
Once again, a telescope would enlarge the image, but was unable to see beyond the horizon.
You're still dealing with perspective. Even a telescope, like the eye, has limits.
A stronger telescope (10x vs 5x for example) could have given a more enhanced view of objects further away.
144
posted on
02/24/2020 12:51:50 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: centurion316
How is it that when you use a pair of binoculars, a zoom camera or a telescope as you see an object "go over the curve" with your naked eye it suddenly comes back into view with the aid of such devices?
Besides, your explanation doesn't explain how objects which are "over the horizon" and that we can't see with our naked eye because of our limited eyesight, clearly become visible when using a viewing aid.
By your understanding they should never be capable of being brought into view because of the curvature yet they are viewable when using a strong zooming object.
145
posted on
02/24/2020 1:00:04 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
I’m sorry that you missed high school physics and geography, but you can circle back and find courses on line. Good luck.
To: Does so
I should mention that Columbus generational ships were tall ships, and could see other tall ships approachingtopgallant and sky sails first.Do you see the nose of a train engine before you see the wheels as the train comes down the track towards you?
147
posted on
02/24/2020 1:02:39 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: centurion316
Im sorry that you missed high school physics and geography, but you can circle back and find courses on line. Good luck.Im sorry that you missed high school biology and art class, but you can circle back and find courses on line. Good luck.
148
posted on
02/24/2020 1:03:38 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Does so
Ive sat in a few bosuns chairs hoisted and sat in captains chair albeit Honduran licensed on the bridge
I didnt see it
But my eyes are bad
149
posted on
02/24/2020 1:17:40 PM PST
by
wardaddy
(I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
To: Does so; Repealthe17thAmendment
I should mention that Columbus generational ships were tall ships, and could see other tall ships approachingtopgallant and sky sails first.But you're just plain wrong in your assertion.
The Ships of Christopher Columbus Were Sleek, Fastand Cramped
Two of the ships, the Niña and Pinta, were tiny by todays standardsonly 50 to 70 feet from bow to sternbut prized for their speed and maneuverability. The Santa Maria, Columbuss flagship, was a larger, heavier cargo ship. Snip...
Small caravels like the Niña and Pinta could only carry between 40 and 50 tons and were crewed by fewer than 30 sailors each. As for the sails...
For Columbuss maiden journey, he used a Spanish update to the caravel known as the caravela redonda, a three-masted ship where the first two masts were rigged with conventional square sails for open-ocean speed, and a third was rigged with a lateen sail for coastal maneuverability.Just to give you some scale for comparison.
It's amazing how the things we think we know to be true often aren't.
150
posted on
02/24/2020 1:32:30 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Does so
151
posted on
02/24/2020 1:42:55 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Impala64ssa
Mt. McKinley is a lot higher than 5,000 feet. Why didn’t he just go up there?
152
posted on
02/24/2020 1:55:49 PM PST
by
samtheman
(FReepers all do want Bernie to get the dem nomination, right? (Just to be clear))
To: philman_36
I would see the nose of the train first—coming or going.
I used “generational” to infer the eventual advent of square-riggers that would carry topgallant, royal- and sky-sails.
Columbus probably already knew of the earth’s roundness from personal experience at the masthead. He and his crew would see an approaching ship’s masthead before seeing the deck, as stated previously.
153
posted on
02/24/2020 2:30:06 PM PST
by
Does so
(...Democrats believe in democracy only when they win the election...)
To: centurion316
154
posted on
02/24/2020 2:32:48 PM PST
by
Does so
(...Democrats believe in democracy only when they win the election...)
To: philman_36
I've not slandered you, I've pointed out the fact that the Flat Earth is an absurdity. There is no evidence in support of it, but true believers are utterly untroubled by that lack.
155
posted on
02/24/2020 2:46:16 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: laplata
156
posted on
02/24/2020 2:47:09 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: Does so
He and his crew would see an approaching ships masthead before seeing the deck, as stated previously.As would any human, but such an observation would be due to the limitations of the human eye and perspective, not from curvature.
As is evidenced by videos up thread, a stronger zooming instrument would have allowed them to see the deck.
157
posted on
02/24/2020 2:55:36 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
158
posted on
02/24/2020 2:59:21 PM PST
by
Pelham
(RIP California, killed by massive immigration)
To: SunkenCiv
You bet.
The Flat Earthers are weird, to say the least.
159
posted on
02/24/2020 3:00:26 PM PST
by
laplata
(The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: SunkenCiv
I've not slandered you...You did slander me...You're a joke, just not a good one.
...I've pointed out the fact that the Flat Earth is an absurdity.
You've done nothing more than share your opinion, as have I.
There is no evidence in support of it, but true believers are utterly untroubled by that lack.
And there you go with the slander again.
Joshua 10:12 Then Joshua spoke to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel:Sun, stand still over Gibeon; And Moon, in the Valley of Aijalon.
13 So the sun stood still, And the moon stopped, Till the people had revenge Upon their enemies.
Is this not written in the Book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day.
Kind of hard for the sun to stand still when the Earth is what is supposed to be orbiting the sun. Or do you not believe the Bible?
...as for me and my house we will follow the Lord. Joshua 24:15
160
posted on
02/24/2020 3:11:14 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-183 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson