Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. judge asks if ex-Trump aide Flynn should be held in contempt
Reuters ^ | May 13, 2020 | Jan Wolfe and Sarah N. Lynch

Posted on 05/14/2020 7:52:32 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Captain Compassion

The fact that Sullivan can not determine whether contempt occurred in his presence in his own Court would lead anyone to believe the contempt charge was not contempt.


21 posted on 05/14/2020 8:51:39 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Sullivan has access to a law library or is he too lazy to do the research to make a decision? How did Sullivan come to choose Gleeson, a former federal judge appointed by Clinton to the bench the same year Sullivan was appointed by Clinton, as the private attorney, not for general legal input, but specifically to submit an opposition brief to a criminal defendant’s case before his court? Obviously he had an ex parte conversation about the criminal case before him in encouraging Gleeson to submit an opposition brief to the criminal defendant’s case. Chances are he never told the defense counsel of his ex parte conversation and shopping around for someone to argue against the defense counsel’s client’s interests or the nature of his conversation with an outsider about the case before him. At this point, he is compromised and no longer a neutral arbiter. He should recuse himself, but he will not because he has decided to use kabuki legal theatre for cover to dramatize from the bench the Democrat narrative that Barr is not independent. Unfortunately there is too much unethical politicized trash like this guy sitting on Federal district court benches today.


22 posted on 05/14/2020 8:57:49 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Clinton fired all of the US Attorneys. The president has no authority over judges. Federal judges can only be impeached.


23 posted on 05/14/2020 9:00:46 AM PDT by gopno1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
Remember how many judges Clinton fired all at once,had to rig the system.

Clinton did not and could not fire federal judges. Those were US Attorneys and it was perfectly legal and no one made a fuss at the time.

That was until Bush fired only a handful of them and the dems went mad with rage and demanded investigations.

24 posted on 05/14/2020 9:01:05 AM PDT by usurper ( version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: usurper

Sounds like how dems act


25 posted on 05/14/2020 9:06:38 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gopno1

Impeachment’s need to start asap a lot of crooked judges on the lose.


26 posted on 05/14/2020 9:08:20 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

I say lets have a trial and use it to further expose the fraud, the perjury trap that was set for Flynn.


27 posted on 05/14/2020 9:42:23 AM PDT by rightprinciples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Keep this in mind next time you’re given a jury summons. The American judicial system is circling the toilet.


28 posted on 05/14/2020 9:42:31 AM PDT by DPMD (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Judges, or attorneys?


29 posted on 05/14/2020 9:53:05 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Both their game is money or power but not all are in that arena.


30 posted on 05/14/2020 10:11:47 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rightprinciples

Sounds like a reasonable action.


31 posted on 05/14/2020 10:12:49 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Flynn has the goods on the Deep State, which is why Sullivan and the Deep State are trying to silence him and prevent his freedom. I wonder if he will be jailed for a fraudulently-applied perjury charge and Epstein’d before the election? Very sad.


32 posted on 05/14/2020 10:40:41 AM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Congress

the Deep State is fouling out in the last minutes of the fourth quarter


33 posted on 05/14/2020 10:42:21 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

Great article in Forbes points out the SCOTUS ruling last week against the 9th Circus prohibited this action, along with an appellate decision even closer to the point in his same district that issues a writ of Mandamus against the trial judge for doing exactly what Sullivan is doing.


34 posted on 05/14/2020 12:24:11 PM PDT by fremont_steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson