Posted on 05/22/2020 9:57:07 AM PDT by Kaslin
Interesting ... the very words from Fokker quoted by Cleveland are the potential reason for allowing Sullivan to proceed. Equally interesting is that Cleveland makes zero effort at defining “pending charges” and address whether a conviction alters that status.
Cleveland may in fact think that the charges were pending in Flynn’s case, but she is not a very good lawyer if she merely assumes they were.
That IS an interesting thread
Was wondering what the backchannel chattering was about in his case
Now We KNOW
Very helpful knowing that, thanks.
Wow. I sure hope someone gets this to the right people to check into it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.