Posted on 08/10/2020 5:58:05 PM PDT by ebb tide
Unless that's what you meant sidelined permanently.
Nor does it change the fact that we, the American taxpayers, funded it.
I surely didn’t vote for Fauci to give the Chinese millions of tax our tax dollars to do work in China that is illegal in these United States, did you?
I did some research. Most of the anti-vaccine, anti-mask push is coming from the QAnon herds. Tens of thousands of subscribers were recently dumped by several social media companies for distributing those conspiracy theories, insults, projections, threats and crimes, so they’re beginning to conceal the source of their efforts. It’s comparable to the Reverend Jim Jones cult in many ways.
China, Russia and other anti-American nations have been encouraging and adding to the disinformation for their own reasons.
Most Internet users today are deluded about the Internet itself and how it works. They ascribe characteristics that don’t exist and are breaking away from the reality of the world around them. It’s been going on for a long time. For example, this forum is not a “room.” Neither were chat channels. The Internet is not a world. It’s only a communications network.
Many people are separating from logic and the way that natural things really interact. I’ve avoided television and most electronic entertainment since 2003, and it has been helpful in some ways.
So how do we treat this training exercise? In my opinion, we should participate in avoiding illness, consequent medical conditions and support a vaccine. The next round might involve something like a much more contagious form of Ebola. Quite a few nations are probably developing such weapons.
There are other promising efforts, but here’s the Moderna timeline along with links to documents.
https://www.modernatx.com/modernas-work-potential-vaccine-against-covid-19
And by the way, China’s military people do see our reactions to the epidemic. Consider what those people see as our weaknesses and their strong points. How might they attack us the next time? Do you see?
Oh, alright..carry on then!
;-)
Of course not, it's a freakin' server somewhere in Fresno, CA. We're all electrons on here.
Is a nuclear warhead dropped on a chinee biolab hot enough to destroy any of the frankenviruses contained therein?
Asking for a friend.
Blah, blah, blah, Fauci, Yada, genetic,Yada
What is "CF"?
I fear what you posited...that they intentionally chose a rather benign engineered virus to unleash as a test.
cluster _
I think the vaccine makers are targeting the protein spike the virus uses to dock with the ACE-2 receptor. That protein never changes and is the Achilles heel of the virus.
Well, I see you’ve changed the terminology so you can count your imaginary friends again. The Infection Fatality Rate is not 0.64-0.66%. If you want to claim that, please provide the values you used in your calculation, with sources.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
Scenario 5: “Current Best Estimate”
And every study done on COVID-19’s IFR in the past ~3 months puts it between 0.64% and 0.66%. Studies like these:
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1327
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30243-7/fulltext
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279720302015
Haven’t seen anyone disagreeing with the narrowed IFR at all. Earlier estimates put a lower bound at 0.26% (could be no lower, per CDC) with a likely range between 0.5% and 1% (Johns Hopkins). Around late May, all the studies began to converge on the 0.64% - 0.66% range.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
Scenario 5: “Current Best Estimate”
And every study done on COVID-19’s IFR in the past ~3 months puts it between 0.64% and 0.66%. Studies like these:
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1327
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30243-7/fulltext
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279720302015
Haven’t seen anyone disagreeing with the narrowed IFR at all. Earlier estimates put a lower bound at 0.26% (could be no lower, per CDC) with a likely range between 0.5% and 1% (Johns Hopkins). Around late May, all the studies began to converge on the 0.64% - 0.66% range.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.