Posted on 11/02/2020 1:17:19 PM PST by dontreadthis
See, and here is where the technical guy in me goes "Huh????!"
There is not one single type of 'machine' used to tabulate votes. There is not one kind of software.
In order to affect vote totals, you must penetrate a given machine (and each type requires a different method of penetration), and then you have to adjust the vote totals in the SOFTWARE, and HERE is where it becomes nigh-impossible.
See, the totals may be stored on a db. Which one? What security controls? Those numbers may be encrypted. How? Maybe the numbers are sent to a flat file. Where do the numbers reside? How can you know where to look? Did you leave out 'decoy' columns which look like vote numbers but is never actually used? There is so much variation, and variability, that I suspect it would be yeomans work to do this hack on a single country.... much less the 50 mini-countries that are our United States.
I suppose an advanced AI system could figure it out, but I don't think AI is that advanced yet.
...why didn’t Hilly use this stuff...
_________________________________________
Montgomery is all over You Tube in the past 4-5 years detailing his work on the Hammer and his really nasty treatment by Clintons, zer0 & Co. Try Dennis Montgomery and database as search terms.
Mcinerney said on War Room today that the Good Guys (he said *we*) were able to thwart the attempt in 2016 and he was prohibited from speaking about the details.
The persistent rumor after the 2016 election was that the NSA White Hats had a war room in the Caribbean and were able to utilize some sort of remote tech to interfere with the electronic sabotage.
I wonder if this story was broken right now, today, as a warning. The progs KNOW their insurance policy failed. They may even know how and why. They may even have worked to eliminate their own vulnerability. But the developer is on our side and must have left himself backdoors, if not kill switches, so....who really knows? We don’t and they do and all we can do is wait.
Dennis Lee Montgomery (born 1953) is an American software designer and former medical technician who sold federal officials computer programs he claimed would decode secret Al-Qaeda messages hidden in Al Jazeera broadcasts and identify terrorists based on Predator drone videos.[1] A 2010 Playboy investigation called Montgomery "The man who conned the Pentagon", saying he won millions in federal contracts for his supposed terrorist-exposing intelligence software.[2] The software was later reported to have been an elaborate "hoax" and Montgomery's former lawyer Michael J. Flynn called him a "con artist" and "habitual liar engaged in fraud".[3]
I figured. The claims made in this article were technically sketchy, to my eye.
Montgomery looks like he’s a fraud. Check Wikipedia.
Furthermore, see my post upthread. I’m very technical, and the claims made by this guy don’t seem technically feasible.
That’s why the witch Billary went ballistic and had a temper tantrum throwing her victory cake at the wall.
Pinging the most technical folk I know. Backtrack on my observations, and see if you don’t agree.
I guess they determined Hillary didn’t need the assist?
See my post #21
Who is Big Tech for?
Shortly after that her staff realized that they were all screwed because the panhandle came in for Trump.
I imagine that none of the staff wanted to tell her, so they let FOX do it.
This is the video in my brain - They turn on FOX and slowly open the door and let FOX break the bad news.
[ Curious
Why would a patriot develop election rigging software even if it were for meddling in other countries’ elections? ]
Because the CIA has been compromised ever since it helped get Mao into power in CHYNA!
I was listening to Glenn Beck a few days after the 2016 election. He had a preacher on who said that he had a childhood friend who was an atheist and a member of the Deep State. The day after the 2016 election his atheist friend called him and said, “God intervened.” The preacher said, “What do you mean?” And his friend told him that 15 crucial states had their voting machines calibrated to go for Hillary and win the election for her. But it didn’t happen. “God intervened.”
____________________
He’s intervening again and has been intervening.
I never believed the 2012 election results. A few days before the election, Mitt Romney held a campaign event in a small town in Pennsylvania and drew a crowd of over 5000. Same day in Cleveland, OH, a major Dem stronghold Obama drew 500. I always thought it was stolen so this is very believable to me.
Software can’t alter ink on paper.
In Georgia, votes are printed for voter confirmation, then scanned and preserved (not destroyed) to verify the electronic submission. That’s 3 copies of each vote, with 2 d@mn near impossible to alter at scale.
Other states may be susceptible, but not all.
John Brennan? he was there during odumbo but not later.
All of that is quite technically possible, and you would need six to eight teams deployed against the right "battleground States" to do it. You would also need insiders in each installation to activate the gimmicks.
A well-funded front organization could develop the software applications to pull this off and deploy the agents to surreptitiously install it. It would take a lot of money and a lot of time to get the agents into positions. Many things could go wrong - and they probably would. Perhaps they did.
The biggest problem would be keeping it concealed. Too many people would be need to be involved. They would be leaving a lot of tracks, including bank records, phone calls, and e-mails. The sort of "impossible" project that you suggest cannot be done cheaply. And people sometimes brag to their friends, who have other friends, who have other friends....
There are also practical difficulties of testing such programs. Malfunctions on the election day(s)of incompletely tested applications would be very likely and any competent software audits would quickly expose the project. Those installation agents would be easy to identify and things would quickly unravel from that point on.
I would expect that there are people who know exactly what to look for and where to look for it.
Well, yeah. I stipulate all that you state. HOWEVER....
.... This is one guy, who claimed he worked on one software product, that could tip foreign elections.... and that this one form of software was now deployed here against us.
Your scenario is a graceful ballet of many, operating at their peak, with no problems.
He asserts that one software product does it all.
To my mind, that is pure nonsense.
If you couple that with the fact this guy was caught defrauding the government for some miracle Farsi translator vaporware, there’s utterly no there there.
Bkmrk
Obama got 99.9% of black vote, 80% of suburban women
Maybe she just loved torturing people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.