Posted on 12/17/2020 8:58:52 AM PST by SeekAndFind
RE: It was impossible to believe it was not deliberate on the morning of December 4, 2020.
I think you meant November 4,2020
With 17-23 million fraudulent ballots likely fraudulently *counted*, the Congressional Republican “down ballot” likely won most seats within a 12% - 17% margin.
I was just listening to Sean Parnell from Penn 17, and his seat was outright stolen, guaranteed. And stolen in different ways.
Multiple, UNCHECKED/UNTRACEABLE ballot dumps between 4 NOV 2020 to 6 NOV 2020, (tens of thousands of ballots) were “found” and dumped, and his opponents staff only laugh at them when in contact.
Meanwhile, sounds like he has tens of thousands of votes cast for him, which will not be counted, because his voters went to vote, and found out they had already cast their ballots (which they never saw), and were forced to cast provisional ballots, which the DNC and courts won’t allow to be counted.
Think about this one scenario...
I have heard the exact thing same thing from all over the country.
AND - Pelosi is still out there “finding” ballots for any races the DNC lost, but were able to keep close, due to the over-sample SCRCD/aSMOTE-b algorithm “fractional ballot leveling”, running through Smartmatic/Dominion/Hart Intercivic/ES&S from coast to coast.
These hardware/software platforms make up 90% of all voting platforms in 2020 America.
WHAT IF TRUMP STATES ON JANUARY 20, 2021:
“THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD INVESTIGATION WILL CONTINUE AND IS NOT STOPPING UNTIL EVIDENCE OF FRAUD IS COMPLETELY REVEALED, FOUND AND UNCOVERED.”
Good question.
RE: “THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FRAUD INVESTIGATION WILL CONTINUE AND IS NOT STOPPING UNTIL EVIDENCE OF FRAUD IS COMPLETELY REVEALED, FOUND AND UNCOVERED
Will he state the above as President? Or will he state it as ex-President?
If the former, yes, he can continue the investigation. If the latter, well, I’m afraid a Biden administration can always shut down any official government attempt at investigating.
The quick answer to the OP question is this: at the point the “errors” have a statistically significant bias in favoring one candidate over another, they cease to be errors and start to become deliberate fraud. True and honest mistakes would be just as likely to favor Trump as they would to favor Biden. But if you have 100 “errors”, 99 of which favor Biden and one favors Trump, it is extremely unlikely statistically that they are all innocent errors. Like one chance in 2^98 ~ 10^29 unlikely.
except all these ‘isolated’ errors, all go one way.
Thank you. That is absolutely what I meant.
Like the Epstein analogy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.