Posted on 02/02/2021 10:20:49 AM PST by Red Badger
Why do you think Washington’s an armed camp?
Because they know what we all know: They are trying to run a government WITHOUT the consent of the governed.
Yeah, if it were me, I’d be hunkering down, too.
just my $1.00 - soon to be worth about $0.02
jimjohn - OUT.
Key parts:
Since the House presented one article with multiple charges it is unconstitutional
“Trump may be making a mistake by declaring himself NOT to be the president.
I would argue that he is in fact the President. He won a majority of votes on election day, and as (see tagline) a legitimate President in exile, he deserves to have his case heard before the Chief Justice.”
Trump is president.
The usurpers claim otherwise.
By going forward they would be acknowledging Trump is president.
He says he is 45th president.
“Nothing can change the fact that Biden is the 46th President. “
That’s not a fact.
It’s a claim.
Your post is reasonable enough but is not relevant.
It is a constitutional crisis and extraordinary time.
Read about BEADS
https://nadler.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=394266
And consider how the Executive Order of 9/2018 go together.
He also says "the 45th President is no longer "President".
If you think about it conviction by the Senate would be a very good thing for all of us. Its gets him up in front of SCOTUS
He could have summarized this neatly in two words:
Screw. Off.
}:-)4
“If you kept the small rules, you could break the big ones.”
― George Orwell, 1984
If you think about it conviction by the Senate would be a very good thing for all of us. Its gets him up in front of SCOTUS
___________________________________________
Does it? Where in the Constitution do you find that a President impeached by the House and Senate has SCOTUS as an appellate court?
Will you take the bet or not?
Any “trial” will be postponed until the midterms.
His lawyers SAY it right in his response. If convicted they assert it a “Bill of Attainder”
The ONLY place a “Bill of Attainder” can be adjudicated is before SCOTUS.
That’s PDJT’s only route to SCOTUS at this point
Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but there seems to be an unintended double negative that renders the following sentence nonsensical:
(Answer 8, part 7, sentence beginning on fourth line of Page 13).
“The 45th President of the United States believes and therefore avers that the defect in the drafting of the Article requires that Senators be instructed that if two thirds of them fail to find any portion of the Article lacking in evidence sufficient for conviction, then the entire Article fails and must be dismissed.”
Why would failure to find a lack of sufficient evidence for conviction be grounds for dismissal?
It makes sense only if you remove the word “lacking”, as follows:
“fail to find in any portion of the Article evidence sufficient to convict”
no.
Its a “prediction” I do believe is his only shot at a decent hearing somewhere -before SCOTUS
“The Deep State can’t afford not to...and its why they have Capitol Hill surrounded in troops and barricades”
They know they pulled off a coup and are trying to incapacitate the legitimate president.
The military is doing a fine, fine job.
It does defy logic, but I’m not a lawyer.......................
[ It’s too late. Nothing can change the fact that Biden is the 46th President. There is nothing in the books that can overturn Biden’s swearing in. It’s over for Trump’s Administration. As much as I would love to see something happen to reverse that it can’t be undone at this point. ]
Trump will never be the 45th president again.... he could become 47 ( remote possibility )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.